Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aww_dang
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
GPT meant, "Get Paid To" in the incentive advertising world. Maybe your product was using this acronym? These robo-takedown outfits are a form of spam in my view. If you are publishing large sites or include user generated content
62.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Why is a square the optimal shape? Is it because of the ease of cutting?
63.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
And if you do become a conspiracy whackjob, wear it with a smile!
64.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
After reviewing the homepage, I can easily imagine why customers might not want that brand of angry political messaging with their coffee purchase. Maybe the pay-what-you want model wasn't the only problem? https://heavytabl
65.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
The misplaced expectation for objective coverage seems to be toxic. Too many flames erupt around it. Bias is too often coverage which contradicts a favored ideology. Instead of expecting objectivity, it may be better to accept incentives an
66.
▲
'Pothole Vigilantes' come out at night to fix Oakland streets
(abc7news.com)
18 points
by
aww_dang
3y ago
|
11 comments
67.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Ideally a sea level canal situation would allow for tidal forces to regulate salinity. The added bonus would be in shipping. I'm not a civil engineer, but the idea that you can constantly generate hydroelectric power while desalinating
68.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
But not profitable enough to avoid bankruptcy?
69.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
They've used similar ID politics smears and guilt by association in their attacks on their libertarian opponents. Personally I'm not a fan of Reason mag or that brand of inflammatory rhetoric.
70.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
I agree with the poster in that I wouldn't want to live in a cult like society or a socialist commune. The question is: "Why can socialists not develop a more desirable communal order under purely voluntary conditions?" Natur
71.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
The irony for me is that Reason mag uses the same irrational, inflammatory ID politics shtick on their opponents. Guilt by association is irrational by definition. I object to it regardless of the speaker's agenda.
72.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
And when it is relevant to the topic at hand, people should bring up those past misdeeds. For example, if those aforementioned sources were selling a new war, it would be relevant to recall the Iraqi WMD debacle. Comments about disgraced CN
73.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Socialists are free to develop other arrangements. Is it a problem of innovation? The distinction here is that even under a hypothetical laissez-faire ideal, socialists would be free to create their own socialist communities of any type. Wh
74.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
>To find out what percentage of people especially want to live under socialism, we need a situation where people have a reasonably attractive socialist option and also a reasonably attractive nonsocialist one. If it is not precisely the
75.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Disclaimer and background: Reason isn't my favorite libertarian outlet. The pejorative commonly used is "beltway libertarian". There's a divide between the Rothbardians and the Koch, Reason and Cato types. Even today, yo
76.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
As the article demonstrates, there's nothing preventing socialists from voluntarily choosing to live in socialist communities, inside of the context of a market oriented economy. The conclusion is that most people simply prefer not to.
77.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
When optimizing for lighthouse pagespeed metrics, yes.
78.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
I preferred the private Amtrak compartment. Overnight trip, bring your own snacks and beverage. Eat a meal or two with other people in the dining car. Read a book and be left alone in your room. Best part was being able to ride a bicycle ri
79.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Giving them my card data feels more expensive than $12/month. The model of paying to remove ads always felt like hostage taking. "Is this ad annoying enough for you? No? You think you're a tough guy? Here's an advert of
80.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Why is the tech real this time? Why is it an awesome company? Give us some substance. Dismissing critics as cynics doesn't tell me anything as a layman. A good exchange between a booster and a debunker adds something to the discussion.
81.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Is engaging with good faith a mistake? It seems less perilous than mind-reading. I found the reply informative.
82.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Personally I suspect all of these official figures. The unofficial speculation isn't much better either. The theme is something like, "The PBoC secretly buys gold to avoid driving prices higher", "Fort Knox is empty! The
83.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Allegedly they have some 2068 tons. For an economy of their size, this isn't that much. Italy claims 2452 tons. https://www.gold.org/goldhub/gold-focus/2023/04/chinas-gold-... . I'm more in the
84.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Engaging with the scammers will disrupt the existing spam filters' heuristics. The long chain of replies will make it harder to eliminate them from inboxes with existing anti-spam filters.
85.
▲
How Much Platinum Is in the World?
(sdbullion.com)
2 points
by
aww_dang
3y ago
|
0 comments
86.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
The article takes the simplistic approach by using the spot price of platinum. A more realistic approach to this fantasy scenario would take account of the increased price of platinum after monetization. >Such a coin would weigh 42,778,9
87.
▲
How Big Would a Coin Made of $1T Worth of Platinum Be? (2013)
(wired.com)
1 points
by
aww_dang
3y ago
|
1 comments
88.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Most of what you listed is already covered by existing meta tags and structured data. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/HTML/Introduc... https://schema.org/author https:&#x
89.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Previous discussion of NOTAM https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34337158
90.
▲
by
aww_dang
3y ago
Is the publicly funded system liable for malpractice? If so, where is the monetary incentive when the taxpayers are on the hook for damages?
More ›