Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
awinder
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
64 ms
·
601.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
So much more elizabeth holmes than steve jobs...
602.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
I’ve been watching the udoo bolt in this type of space (small form factor ryzen based pc for a possible homelab) but their lede time is quite far out: https://www.mouser.com/Search/Refine?Ntk=P_MarCom&Ntt=135138...
603.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
But not quite like an estate since you have to have an estate larger than $11.4M before any taxes will be applied to it. That raised limit was also part of the tax bill; you’re just offsetting the cost.
604.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
Why use many word when few word do trick
605.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
I’m definitely with you in spirit but I really wish we could also work on the “disagree but commit” skill directly. This project was going to have 10B in cost overruns, meanwhile the F-35 project has hundreds of billions sunk into it and th
606.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
The federal coal leasing program has been a frequent target for overpricing coal with some estimates at around a billion a year in benefit. There's also things like opening new areas for drilling in areas that are only profitable when
607.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
LOL! It really is something to behold, this article is a pretty good rundown in what’s going on (I would think I was making this up as some fringe thing, if I had not watched it first hand) https://www.nytimes.com/2019/
608.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
They learn / don't learn that skill from kidfluencers on YouTube. From what I've seen with my daughter that's a super-weaponized form of advertising compared to what I grew up in, anyone who survives Ryan and turns out
609.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
That’s basically the proposition of any event sourcing system https://www.martinfowler.com/eaaDev/EventSourcing.html but you’re kinda right, that involves a level of code complication (but then it would be so simple as
610.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
i'm not even sure what the answer to this is other than to say -- it's a completely contrived example and there's no way you would answer such a question let alone be asked about it. getting on the stand isn't some gran
611.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
2018 was not a great year on the markets (regardless of feel-good business confidence in 2018), farms & manufacturing are getting killed by the tariffs. Your facts & my facts coexist in the real world.
612.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
theres a lot of reasons for someone to look at both what and how trump is approaching this, and rationally come away less-than-enthused: 1. Poor execution & personnel at odds with each other leaking play-by-play details has led to a lot
613.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
Thinking out loud, but despite politicians going all over market-style structures (i.e., pay-for-performance with teachers, making welfare recipients jump through hoops, etc.) maybe you could flip this table on politicians for beneficial re
614.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
yeah that's still a 100% increase in the number of cases where federal funding is necessary given what the parent poster claimed. also now that we've expanded the pool to include emergencies, all we need to do is coach any argume
615.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
charitably there is an angle to this that has some validity -- increases to the top tax rate should probably be paired with wealth recapture through inheritance taxation to ensure that you don't just build a gigantic firewall for exist
616.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
holding a million dollars is way different than earning a million dollars in a given year. the number of people who earn 500K/1M in a given calendar year is a much, much smaller subset.
617.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
it's 57% _on the amount made over 500K/1M/whatever_ to boot, so you're really talking about nominal taxation effects until you're like 4x whatever the income limit is on this mythical "new top bracket"
618.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
how do you then explain the period from 1925 (post war reductions) to 1940 where the top tax rate was increased to finance government during the great depression?
619.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
I'm not taking a side here and said nothing about not listening to any conservative or closing off to debate. I'm merely pointing out that "college kids didn't want to listen to token conservative talkinghead A or B&quo
620.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
Reminder: having shitty ideas is not a protected class, and “free speech” does not mean you get to say whatever batshit crazy thing comes to mind without other people expressing themselves
621.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
Is microsoft actually making a lot of money off Azure once you've divorced office 365 revenue from the cloud bucket? Clearly you made a good market decision but I've yet to see anything to suggest that Azure as a pure-play is a r
622.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
In a lot of cases you really don't want a server at that layer of the stack anyways, when you could be serving your site from a CDN/"edge" that's built for low-latency to end users, cost-optimized for transfer and n
623.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
The success rate on proxy votes is fairly low but not at a rate where it effectively never happens. The actual voting mechanism might offer more of a poor behavior deterrent than anything else (like: votes happen and they do succeed, so ma
624.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
Pretty obviously market-testing some ideas on how to structure a tweaked index fund with higher management fees (references in the closing to charging 25 basis points and the "platform" which has no other details available)
625.
▲
by
awinder
7y ago
I'm ready for what comes next after Agile. I've been through about 5 Agile shops now. I would say one of the 5 ran Agile well, the rest were a mess that just makes it frustrating for everyone. I can't tell you
626.
▲
by
awinder
8y ago
I hopped between lead -> manager -> lead and I agree, though it’s informative to see the problem approached from both sides if you can stomach a manager stint (I had much trouble). Lead/Manager pairs have roughly the same success
627.
▲
by
awinder
8y ago
So that top tier is starting a new business line inside the company essentially? Or is the idea that that company might get spun off to a separate entity eventually? This sounds like a pretty nifty / unique idea so just curious how t
628.
▲
by
awinder
8y ago
IP churn is a huge problem with email that everyone has to fight, these are the emails you’re getting from like list sellers and the like. And you don’t have to even have to spin up new hardware or vms, you can be in something like aws wher
629.
▲
by
awinder
8y ago
You can absolutely make it so that gmail accepts your legitimate email if you're delivering email at high scale. A lot of people here running their own email servers would have no problem with the same emails getting delivered if they
630.
▲
by
awinder
8y ago
This may be a fair sentiment for an educational institution (you're not directly making money from email sending / hopefully admissions marketing doesn't have this problem), but as a candidate I'd be extremely concerned
More ›