avs733

5 ms·

31.
by avs733 6mo ago
A gay mobile kitchen?
32.
by avs733 6mo ago
If we are going to say violence isn’t okay then it is important that we be clear about the boundaries of what we define as violence. Theft is a nice analogy here. The default model of theft is property crime but the largest type of theft is
33.
by avs733 6mo ago
From liability! If this were to actually happen I can only imagine financial liability is the least of their concerns? What scares me most about this is the narrowness of thought to match this fear with this response.
34.
by avs733 6mo ago
I read this twice thinking it was an April fools joke I wasn’t getting.
35.
by avs733 7mo ago
and I imagine that if the INVERSE of this case had come up, the police suing for defamation would have been protected by qualified immunity so no lawsuit would have been possible. The police being able to leverage civil law against citizens
36.
by avs733 7mo ago
>If the company violates their ToS, you can take them to court (or arbitration). This is my favorite...how exactly can I monitor compliance? No evidence of non-compliance - get tossed out of court. No court order for discovery - no abili
37.
by avs733 7mo ago
I don't think the commenter you are responding too thinks this is a good thing - they are just describing that it is. I read it as just a blunt summary of how absurd this situation is.
38.
by avs733 8mo ago
out of context that makes sense...but in the context of a case report how do you implement that? The patients have privacy rights and the authors/doctors have a responsibliity to protect them. That doesn't justify this but it does
39.
by avs733 8mo ago
not only that but they leveraged the 'compliance' mindset that comes with government institutions to do so. This was first reported at least a week or two ago and only now are they getting aroun dto thinking about making it an act
40.
by avs733 8mo ago
That simply says if a company offers a service the government gets to cut the line. It doesn say I have to make them a hamburger if I’m a sushi restaurant.
41.
by avs733 8mo ago
They are a private company they can largely sell or not sell they want. They aren’t saying they won’t build them because they are to effective they are saying they won’t build them because they aren’t safe.
42.
by avs733 8mo ago
As just a statement of bias…the guys at that site have a pretty clear distaste for Tesla. They are industry experts and that’s where their analysis comes from, but it’s palpable. I would call it evidence versus politically based but noting
43.
by avs733 8mo ago
To be clear ….violations of their, repeatedly update, permit to paint cars. Something the website labels impossible.
44.
by avs733 8mo ago
Feel free to provide sources for the claims
45.
by avs733 8mo ago
He doesn’t need to refute it he just needs to offer an alternate claim. The site provides no citations, no evidence, so there’s no need to defend the count argument or honestly even make it. The sit isn’t just false, it is flat out disrespe
46.
by avs733 8mo ago
Or the person writing this has? Just because it’s in GitHub doesn’t mean it’s more credible than the stuff my mother posts on Facebook about mark zuckerberg not having permission to use her photos.
47.
by avs733 8mo ago
The site is wrong about the Fremont plant being exempted as detailed here: https://dailykanban.com/2016/09/29/docs-reveal-teslas-produc... (With things like…links to their permit applications, I.e., sources)
48.
by avs733 8mo ago
I confuses “it’s hard” with “it’s banned” It’s…not even wrong it is detached from any effort at truth.
49.
by avs733 8mo ago
Without sources all of this is…suspicious at best. They list playing and Cnc machining as banned and then only describe the chemicals used in playing. There is a huge defense production industry in CA and an even larger machining industry t
50.
by avs733 8mo ago
which has been warped all out of any comprehensible reality. It hinges on the idea of 'voluntarily' turning over information. Much of what is now considered information voluntarily turned over isn't even information that pe
51.
by avs733 8mo ago
thanks for the HN community - the video is how I ended up here and its one of the few social media-esque sites I bother visiting. Taught me a pile of things about coding and CS that weren't in my mechanical engineering degree.
52.
by avs733 8mo ago
I didn’t, still don’t, but that’s a lost cause. I’ll note that this video is way out of date…both in content and my skills as a speaker :P
53.
by avs733 8mo ago
If you are the risk and the insurance for that risk you aren’t a middle man you are the mob.
54.
by avs733 8mo ago
Now do something something soup something https://soup.gua-le-ni.com/
55.
by avs733 8mo ago
A work to rule union would probably do more damage to space x than a strike…
56.
by avs733 9mo ago
Whoever needs to to do their job. And you put in security controls (e.g. part A and part B). Also compensate your people well and don’t publicize who they are. Semiconductor does this all the time…engineers on team A know only about their p
57.
by avs733 9mo ago
The question isn’t whether they want it is whether they have a business need, as with any employee. The CEO of vocal cola has no business need to know the secret formula. Giving it to him has no upside only downside, so you don’t.
58.
by avs733 9mo ago
Regular car factories with a fancy name.
59.
by avs733 9mo ago
That is a wildly misleading headline…
60.
by avs733 9mo ago
I’ve started to refer to it as the “Tony Soprano presidency”. It fits so much of the logic.

More ›