avmich

11 ms·

151.
by avmich 1y ago
That's all irrelevant. When you use robots instead of actual people, you don't need that large manufacturing force - I mean, that many people in direct manufacturing. People will work on robots, yes - but robots will work on produ
152.
by avmich 1y ago
We live in different universes.
153.
by avmich 1y ago
Why don't you think the growth of productivity can't reduce the products costs below the alternatives?
154.
by avmich 1y ago
> Big Tech and governments (like with chat control in the EU) want to shine light in every part of your personal life. What would be a way to shine light in every part of their private life?
155.
by avmich 1y ago
Diplomacy will have to be involved, and "the other side" media voices as well. But we also have to think about what would happen without proper pushback - what the following wannabe autocrats would plan.
156.
by avmich 1y ago
Just like in wars, it's crucially important who was the first. Mass layoffs of those assigned under decided violator should be different than unbased layoffs happening now - it's how the law works.
157.
by avmich 1y ago
Didn't we have economists' consensus then about what's going to happen?
158.
by avmich 1y ago
The proof immediately follows from the ability of silicon systems in principle to model carbon ones with arbitrary precision.
159.
by avmich 1y ago
Formal logic serves as a useful filter. In other words, "crap in, filtered crap out" - remember, evolution works with absolutely random, "crap" mutations, which then are "filtered" by the environment.
160.
by avmich 1y ago
Probabilistic constraints are all around us. You learn that the sine function is the ratio of the length of the side of the right triangle opposite to the angle to the length of the side opposite to the right angle, so obviously the sine is
161.
by avmich 1y ago
That's not what I was asking. The definition - at least my def - is different, your cases don't explain how to solve it - indeed, there is no known solution, and that's the point. You can't get around government, which c
162.
by avmich 1y ago
I don't think your definition of commons is the same as mine. How would you maintain the road if I, who also uses the road, doesn't pay for maintenance?
163.
by avmich 1y ago
> Never trust anything written by lawyers/economics/MBAs on climate change - only analysis by chemical or mechanical engineers is worth reading. > Methane pyrolysis is an old technology from early days of oil refining for pr
164.
by avmich 1y ago
Fortunately the US demonstrated they can elect racial minority president, so different gender president can happen too.
165.
by avmich 1y ago
Yes, extremes are problematic - marxism as left-left or fascism as right-right. At the moment though USA surely has a problem with the latter.
166.
by avmich 1y ago
So how the tragedy of commons problem is solved?
167.
by avmich 1y ago
I would really like to see private medical system problem solved in USA.
168.
by avmich 1y ago
Are you questioning the idea of having goverments to solve tragedy of commons problem?
169.
by avmich 1y ago
With senators that's by design. But there are also issues with representatives, and I'm not sure how it came to be and if it can be solved.
170.
by avmich 1y ago
It surely seem like it's way more frequently the issue with right, rather than left. For example there are few if any examples of interfering with scientific work during the Baden administration, while there are many during the Trump o
171.
by avmich 1y ago
So we don't have just data now, but data-obtained-by-particular-process? If you have a database, should it matter how it was gathered?
172.
by avmich 1y ago
Fails Clark's law?
173.
by avmich 1y ago
One more step Please complete the security check to access
174.
by avmich 1y ago
"Socialist planning system" can also be - approximately, of course - compared to modern, 2020-s Russia, and modern China (PRC, not Taiwan). The renaissance of economy by the end of 1990-s was significantly assisted by moving towar
175.
by avmich 1y ago
I would compare "larger businesses" with "socialistic planning system" while "smaller businesses" with "free market economy". There are examples when centralized planning got good results - NASA'
176.
by avmich 1y ago
1. I think the author is wrong. 2. There is too little space :) to explain why - indeed, it's refuting one by one the points. A critical point is that, roughly, there is no "middle ground" between "correct" and &quo
177.
by avmich 1y ago
> Progressives do everything they possibly can to make it expensive and risky to hire people. Could you provide some evidence? Please avoid workers rights cases.
178.
by avmich 1y ago
They also must be optional :) . DMCA is too outdated.
179.
by avmich 1y ago
> He means that they are cash flow negative if you discount all government income and at the same time include all costs with those launches :P That would be a strange evaluation.
180.
by avmich 1y ago
> As I said in my other comments, just cause something is sold at a lower cost doesn't mean its optimal. No, Starship isn't optimal, it's just better than existing alternative by this specific criteria. If you need some ot

More ›