Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aviaviavi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
A Failed Effort to Get Paid for an Open Source Project
(medium.com)
3 points
by
aviaviavi
7y ago
|
0 comments
62.
▲
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
Just an fyi, toodles has a CLI command if you pass the `no_server` flag, might save you some coding.
63.
▲
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
Priority does get encapsulated via the special p=INT key val. Also the edits you make in the UI actually are applied to the code! :D My work flow is running a toodles server in a copy of our repo they we reserve for toodles, and commit the
64.
▲
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
Ah sorry that was a little confusing. "#" signifies a tag / label in toodles, so #pr means adding the literal "pr" tag to the todo. So we're not adding a PR number.
65.
▲
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
> Does anyone else have a codetag for this? DEBUG doesn't seem to be a well-known codetag, and I'd prefer to use something other people use. My team now uses `TODO(#pr)`. The #pr tag meaning it should be taken care of in this p
66.
▲
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
Also not at all, I think a docker container is a good idea :D I'll probably just upload some binaries to start, but that's a good next step
67.
▲
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
Just curious, which stack resolver are you using?
68.
▲
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
> If there's a way that the developers can run it without installing the Haskell suite (maybe binary releases for Windows, Linux, macOS), we will try it. Great, I was waiting for someone to ask for a binary distribution before actua
69.
▲
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
Very cool! Assigning to teams definitely makes sense. I built this to help organization at a 4 person company so hopefully we'll grow enough to one day exercise that strategy :)
70.
▲
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
Oh that's a cool idea - Maybe there's an opportunity extend this into a github/gitlab/etc plugin. I'll look into that!
71.
▲
Show HN: Toodles – Project management directly from the TODO's in your code
(github.com)
151 points
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
|
44 comments
72.
▲
Show HN: curl-runnings - a framework for declarative, curl based tests for APIs
(github.com)
13 points
by
aviaviavi
8y ago
|
0 comments
73.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
Thank you for all of these suggestions, very appreciated! I'll work through implementing these. Also, please see my explanation of the `read` calls below, but I plan to change those to `readMaybe`s, since there is a need to parse numbe
74.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
It does indeed do that, there are numeric values returned as strings (i have _no_ idea why they do that), which is why I had `read` in there. I didnt know about readMaybe though, I'll definitely do that, thanks!
75.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
Glad you liked it! I'm using this library to do my own analysis and visualization of the value of different coins to inform my own investing. My goal there is that some more tools will fall out of that endeavor, which I would also rele
76.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
Already done, mentioned that here too just in case :)
77.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
Feedback is welcome! I wrote this library for my own use, but I'm happy to hear any suggestions, code improvements, etc
78.
▲
Show HN: Haskell library for pricing and information on crypto-currencies
(github.com)
86 points
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
|
17 comments
79.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
Json5 allows trailing commas. It also allows for comments, so definitely use json5 where you can
80.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
If you often switch different versions of any of your config files, confetti may suit your needs better than stow: https://github.com/aviaviavi/confetti . If you just use stow for basic dotfiles management, confetti wil
81.
▲
Show HN: Confetti – A simple config file swapping tool, built in Haskell
(github.com)
2 points
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
|
0 comments
82.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
You're correct, it really should be the 2nd way. The current form isn't really a problem per se, mostly just that the generated hashes are really long and make the output harder to read. I'll get that updated, great catch. ED
83.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
This is a cool idea. I would love to do this, but realistically won't have time for a little while. I can certainly look into it more when I get some spare time!
84.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
Ah, I think this is a better though! If you got this working, feel free to open up a PR. Or I can look into it when I get time.
85.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
I'm not familiar with Literate Haskell, what would that involve?
86.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
Also, unless I'm mistaken, TypeFamilies are the relevant GHC extension here. I'm not exactly sure how this would be written differently without that
87.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
That would be awesome! Hopefully over time I (or anyone contributing) can spend a little more time making it as idiomatic as possible and beefing up the docs a little bit. Please let me know if you end up doing that!
88.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
Yeah, it's for the compiler, otherwise it can't figure out that a BlockChainState is actually a SpockState m. I'm not really sure how it could otherwise, since the definition is completely decoupled from Spock. It should be n
89.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
If you learned a thing about blockchains from this project, I'd call it a big success too! :D So happy to hear it was helpful
90.
▲
by
aviaviavi
9y ago
Those libraries were essential for this project! High quality. Are you a contributor to them? I actually had a slightly tough time finding good examples to work off of for p2p, (the cloud haskell website had the best ones), so hopefully thi
More ›