avazhi

6 ms·

61.
by avazhi 2mo ago
I wasn’t addressing America at all, I was responding to a quote suggesting that china is some benign benevolent power. What’s the logical fallacy where you change the subject and point out how some other unrelated entity does the same thing
62.
by avazhi 2mo ago
Why don’t you ask the countries around the South China Sea how that’s going for them.
63.
by avazhi 2mo ago
We need those microscope guys to take some shots of this.
64.
by avazhi 2mo ago
Whether you agree with it or not has no effect on whether it's AI slop or not. Outside of math or coding, domains in which there is objective determinism, any AI outputs are slop to the extent they purport to represent the AI's su
65.
by avazhi 2mo ago
This site is AI slop.
66.
by avazhi 2mo ago
I didn't say anything about profitability. Since Anthropic is all about the good of mankind etc, ostensibly profitability isn't their number one priority.
67.
by avazhi 2mo ago
You are correct you have no reason to believe OAI compared to me. But I’m sure you’re aware that they are the ones making the extraordinary claim here. I’m simply saying it sounds like something that advertising would come up and it’s right
68.
by avazhi 2mo ago
I was saying it’s the only model I don’t rage at for its incompetence.
69.
by avazhi 2mo ago
> > Or we are just assuming that was a PR stunt, which it almost certainly was. > It wasn't. Prove it. But you can’t, which is problematic for you. Nobody should believe anything OpenAI says about anything. They either lied ab
70.
by avazhi 2mo ago
Some stories/long narratives; and a bunch of coding related stuff in Rust and different LUAs as well as some C; working with graphics and generating effects in DDS images; a bunch of Python stuff. The conversational and story stuff sur
71.
by avazhi 2mo ago
Is this the same thing that broke out of the sandbox and into HuggingFace? Or we are just assuming that was a PR stunt, which it almost certainly was. Either way, this shit isn’t getting near my system.
72.
by avazhi 2mo ago
Well, Opus 5 and Fable are the only models I don’t constantly swear at and call stupid, which seems like a pretty good moat to me. My guess is all the commenters (you are the 4th person I’ve seen say this) saying ‘Anthropic has no moat’ hav
73.
by avazhi 2mo ago
I stopped bothering with Grok for anything when 4.5 dropped. It was so awful that I figured Elon had given up and was going to give alll his compute to Anthropic. I’m extremely sceptical anyways - Grok 4.5 was probably the worst model I eve
74.
by avazhi 2mo ago
*Main comment should say 'something so niche' not 'something so nice' There are certain parts of the world that really have little to no bearing on the rest of it. NZ is perhaps Exhibit A of this; Iceland is perhaps Exhi
75.
by avazhi 2mo ago
AI slop article about an extremely niche industry in an irrelevant country? I’ll pass. What part of this is ostensibly intellectually stimulating because it seems like transparent marketing to me, and poor marketing at that. We don’t need p
76.
by avazhi 2mo ago
The same reason apple could reasonably block people from selling anything with an easily falsifiable claim: misleading consumers is bad, and apps that are misleading aren’t allowed. That already exists. Telling people you can tell them thei
77.
by avazhi 2mo ago
You accidentally and completely unknowingly came up with an app with the same name that does the same thing down to having the same bug? Nah. This is marketing spam. Get this shit outta here.
78.
by avazhi 2mo ago
> You'd admit that large grocery chains do have high profits right? Even with "razor thin" margins. Large grocery outlets do love to claim that their margins are razor thin yet somehow each of them are some of the wealthie
79.
by avazhi 2mo ago
Not the person you're replying to. I'm white/non Jewish, and I have a law degree and work in the legal industry. My post history is 'wide open'. Under no definition of genocide (as defined either going back to the m
80.
by avazhi 3mo ago
Western models censor just as much shit as the Chinese models do, big guy, it’s just different material. While we should be pushing for universal fully uncensored models, this comment is lazy and trite at this point. But you already know th
81.
by avazhi 3mo ago
Why would any of us care what people 200 or 500 years in the future think of us? Peak irrelevance.
82.
by avazhi 3mo ago
Probably because food and agriculture (in the region that produces a quarter of America’s domestic food supply) are required for life, while data centers aren’t?
83.
by avazhi 3mo ago
I couldn’t care less about children or about what is ultimately a parenting issue (keep your fucking kids off the internet). A problem that affects a subset of the population is not something that should be solved by subjecting the entire p
84.
by avazhi 3mo ago
Kagi is great, but it's twice as expensive as I think it would have to be for me to feel like I'm actually getting good value for it, unfortunately.
85.
by avazhi 3mo ago
And? Nobody cares. This is neither a controversy nor news, and that would be the case even if Anthropic hadn’t just settled a 1.5 billion dollar lawsuit where they trained Claude on thousands of books without permission lol. To be clear I’m
86.
by avazhi 3mo ago
That’s not what frontier means. There are two frontier labs - OpenAI and Anthropic, and maybe 4 frontier models currently. That term refers to model capacity and in general represents a model’s capability relative to the rest of the industr
87.
by avazhi 3mo ago
Surveillance no, but potentially being banned, yes. Reddit is Exhibit A for this for me when I think about how I used to use it versus how I use it today. I wish Musk was actually serious about that whole free speech absolutist shit because
88.
by avazhi 3mo ago
The irony of this article that was originally posted completely free on The Conversation being stuck behind a Fortune paywall is a bit much. https://theconversation.com/when-can-a-power-company-take-yo...
89.
by avazhi 3mo ago
If what you are saying were true, I could rank anything high by simply putting everything actually higher than it in rank into one named set and then turn around and say that the thing I want to highly rank comes in 2nd only to that first s
90.
by avazhi 3mo ago
I'll come back to this - it's been awhile since I studied it and a cursory examination of my old notes has me spotting some misconceptions on my part as expressed here; at the very least I could have expressed myself better in bot

More ›