automatic6131

5 ms·

31.
by automatic6131 3mo ago
The problem isn't capitalism, well it's not JUST capitalism. If you give any group of individuals that level of wealth control, the same pattern repeats. They can be shareholders, board directors, or commissars or general secretar
32.
by automatic6131 3mo ago
Humiliation-assisted prompting. it's the future.
33.
by automatic6131 3mo ago
Almost no one said those were impossible, just hard. This is completely different. Rather like... a train in a vacuum tube hard. Definitely harder than making a subway with autonomous trains under a modern city. And much harder than being a
34.
by automatic6131 3mo ago
Is it too eugenecist to hope those losers won't reconsider and stay childfree? I think it would be for the best if I didn't have to meet them at parental things.
35.
by automatic6131 3mo ago
>because they don't try to be quite so antagonistic to us in everything they do. Just because the many headed dragon is trying to bite your sailors' heads doesn't mean you should pilot your ship into the whirlpool
36.
by automatic6131 4mo ago
You're asserting a dichotomy that doesn't exist. One can both create and extract at the same time. That's why we're here debating, because one can create value, and one can extract value. Both statements are true and eas
37.
by automatic6131 4mo ago
"let's go the opposite way" Do you have any popular open source projects? Or are you just an Internet gremlin?
38.
by automatic6131 5mo ago
If inference was profitable - they'd tell us. Msft, goog, public companies. They'd break out the numbers and show us, if they were good. But instead, all we get is known liars going on podcasts and repeating "stylized facts&q
39.
by automatic6131 5mo ago
It will end slowly, and then very suddenly. The demand for AI simply doesn't exist at the real prices. It barely exists at the current subsidized rates - Microsoft, Google, Meta, Anthropic, OpenAI are spending hundreds of billions to m
40.
by automatic6131 5mo ago
"You asked a simple question. They lobbed a document." Oh look, another blog post that should have been a comment. No slop blogs either, loser.
41.
by automatic6131 5mo ago
Will it be a WeWork moment? I hope so, I want some comedy gold (I cannot afford the mineral kind).
42.
by automatic6131 5mo ago
I just realized what the "AI summarize" feature is for. This kinda turd. I'd never wanted to use it, because either I wanted the joy of reading whatever it was - or needed the details in full because it's documentation.
43.
by automatic6131 5mo ago
This article is written atrociously. It's geniunely unpleasant to read the basement tier slop like this. It doesn't matter if it has a salient point because this article could have been a comment.
44.
by automatic6131 5mo ago
> Why do they think they are "helping" with hallucinated rubbish that can't even build? Because they can't tell the difference between what the machine is outputting, and what people have built. All they see is the su
45.
by automatic6131 6mo ago
We could have the roblox oof but then there'd be the possibility of giving (a certain) amateur world backgammon championship participant money
46.
by automatic6131 6mo ago
No actually it's the worst case
47.
by automatic6131 6mo ago
I think I'm just salty (and overfitting) that my cousin studied one opening to a stupid depth and beat me ~10 games in a row with it
48.
by automatic6131 6mo ago
Define "average" and "very good" - it's quite easy to become good enough to beat all your friends and family (as long as you haven't made friends at the chess club or chess competitions). But if you want to do
49.
by automatic6131 6mo ago
> mapped capslock + J K L I This is such a good idea that it makes other peoples machines nearly useless for you All credit to https://tonsky.me/blog/cursor-keys/
50.
by automatic6131 6mo ago
>All that has to happen is for people to stop reproducing And if they don't?...
51.
by automatic6131 6mo ago
There is definitely value in that, but that value is outweighed - dominated, even - by the incentive produced to fix outcomes, incentivized by that money put on the line.
52.
by automatic6131 7mo ago
Nope, using the "I am very intelligent" comic doesn't work to defend those who want to eliminate society
53.
by automatic6131 7mo ago
>The idealized future in my option has something like 1/1000th of the current population Okay! You first though. What, still here?
54.
by automatic6131 7mo ago
I just don't believe these geekbench numbers represent real world performance numbers. Like... Firefox compile times or late game civ 6 turn times or such things
55.
by automatic6131 7mo ago
The hezbollah pagers op, now that was an operation. And I'm willing to bet 99% of the work was done the usual way, many years in the making.
56.
by automatic6131 7mo ago
This is pure delusion. Completely dry of any data, based on vibes and a vague whiff that maybe a chatbot did all the hard work done by hardworking spooks. Effective operations have happened just like this long before chatgpt launched.
57.
by automatic6131 8mo ago
I think it's fine to lose the stalks - in a Ferrari. You're making tradeoffs in usability for aesthetics anyway so a few more makes sense. But the locations of these particular ones - at prime thumb access location, plus the high
58.
by automatic6131 8mo ago
Good car interior design fulfills the functions of: usability; sensibility and brand identity. What's good for a LaFerrari (which has many of the same feature on the wheel as this, but imo, better) is not going to be good on a Hyundai
59.
by automatic6131 8mo ago
That steering wheel looks absolutely awful. Like a budget car. And the UX is rubbish. The easiest to reach buttons are ones that are nearly never needed: drive mode (usually used 0-2 times per trip), wiper mode (but no single wipe?). The on
60.
by automatic6131 8mo ago
Do we have Doom on a USB-C plug microcontroller yet?

More ›