Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ausudhz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
That's why we need new licensing. Because the OSS is open doesn't mean they can use data without the owner's permission. Of course today we don't have license that covers for it, but I'm pretty sure it'll come
32.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
No, grandma won't be compensated because she's not the data owner and she doesn't have a copyright on her recipe. Who get compensated currently are all the recipe websites that have the grandma recipe on it and gain money fro
33.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
Yes it will if the access to their website drops (and it will if people get information from a chat rather than visiting a website)
34.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
That's a good take, but the point I think is on revenue sharing. You can use data, just reward the data owners a fair percentage based on the incoming revenue of the Company (big or small)
35.
▲
Ask HN: ChatGPT and AI-like services do reward data owners?
3 points
by
ausudhz
4y ago
|
8 comments
36.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
If with these 20$ I can blame the machine for any bug maybe I can think about it
37.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
Conflict of interest
38.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
Depends, only the one that do the 10 minutes YouTube video and/or 500 words article to make money from ads. If you dig well, there are people who do really good content out there
39.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
Depends on the human
40.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
> it doesn’t matter if content was written by a human or by a machine It matters a lot instead. On the top of my mind I can think about few reasons: - if you've to train a NLP model you'd rather do with data that is not autogen
41.
▲
Detect ChatGPT Generated Content
(gptzero.me)
103 points
by
ausudhz
4y ago
|
102 comments
42.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
It would still need human to develop enough data to have an AI to come with something meaningful. If were to ask an AI model how to structure a good e-commerce when no previous data on e-commerce was available probably you'd get nothin
43.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
You ever been to an hotel before?
44.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
I also prefer to have people reading my mind but communication helps. Plus most of the time switching a button to "no disturb" would do, I don't know what are you ranting about. So what if the Airbnb does daily cleaning? You
45.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
put "no disturb" in your hotel room and confirm it to the reception. They'd not enter
46.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
How can you compare two things when one of them is not available? It's implied that both Airbnb and hotel must be available to make a comparison. When that's the case most of the time hotels are better. That being said, if there a
47.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
There are hotels that do have it. They're called residence
48.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
> Maybe I'm just to old to deal with that crap. Same I don't want to think if my flight delays for a few hours whether the host can give me the key, where we should meet etc. I just want to get in the room as soon as possible k
49.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
None of the hotels I went to ever charged me more than once. I've been in many both for work and for pleasure in 4 continents
50.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
Use hotels. Airbnb has been comparable to hotels in the area, without extra services, no loyalty points, no daily cleaning (in many cases) and no added value at all. At least before you'd pay significantly less than an hotel. Now hotel
51.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
Chinese reminder theorem is from 300 CE. 1700 years ago. That's actively used in some libraries to validate the key (as stated in the link) Euler just proved what Fermat theorized.
52.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
Is not complex at all, if you can't multiply two prime number and do subtraction probably you should reconsider your skills. If people were able to do that in 15th century by hand I don't see how who really needs it couldn't.
53.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
I did that in university before you born It can be done manually easily
54.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
That's the point. Still though is very old is not a 19th century problem. Yet RSA was used 400 years after the theory behind Why didn't people came up with a manual "RSA" before. Since the math is 400 years old.
55.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
You took the wrong one
56.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
What are you talking about. That was the first cipher. RSA is OTP?
57.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
For centuries people have been encrypting things "by hand" and "inconveniently" (Cesar's cipher is an example, I can make many more). RSA doesn't largely depends on the existence of computer, it could've b
58.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
Though there could've been different ways to ask rather than saying, arrogantly, "wheel is used everyday too"
59.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
> With this optimization, the values of n, e and d are not required, hence are ignored by typical implementations whenever p, q, dp, dq and qinv are available* > *at least for OpenSSH, they do not have to be present: setting p=q=1 and
60.
▲
by
ausudhz
4y ago
I think C is Turing complete for sure.
More ›