austinjp

65 ms·

871.
by austinjp 8y ago
On what research are you basing your list of recommended periodic checkups?
872.
by austinjp 8y ago
I'm unclear on their readme. Right at the bottom, they seem to suggest that once runC implements rootless containers, it will be a superior solution since it conforms to the Open Containers Initiative. Checking runC's GitHub, they
873.
by austinjp 8y ago
Both buttons work for me on mobile. Can't be sure, but that page looks like a JavaScript heavy "single page app" type situation, so if your JS is turned off that might explain things. Incidentally, both links just pop up a si
874.
by austinjp 8y ago
I'd be interested in hearing from vendors who are tied to Chrome. Authy springs to mind, only because their product is literally the only reason I still have Chrome installed anywhere.
875.
by austinjp 8y ago
This looks great, I'm going to try it out. Thanks for building it.
876.
by austinjp 8y ago
A few of these are nice enough, but not "stunning". You really do need to pay a talented human for that, currently. I'm a little concerned that automated creative services like this are encouraging a race to the bottom, a mor
877.
by austinjp 8y ago
Apologies, you're quite right, they're using "transcranial alternating current stimulation" a.k.a. tACS during sleep. Now I'm at my desktop I can read the paper, and see that they applied direct current during task
878.
by austinjp 8y ago
By no means my area of expertise, but a quick glance suggests: The experimenters set up a system that could detect slow-wave (SW) fluctuations in brain activity. They used trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (electro-magnets on the scalp) to
879.
by austinjp 8y ago
If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Biomechanics are only one part of the complex picture regarding back pain. This article is full of outdated value-laden and fear-inducing language such as "spine is in an impro
880.
by austinjp 8y ago
I seriously believe that the "cachet" that traditional publishing confers is a major block that prevents innovation in this area. For the racket of academic publishing to be upended, there has to be motivation. This remains the un
881.
by austinjp 8y ago
Good work, you deserve every single bit of it. Keep going. You can do it.
882.
by austinjp 8y ago
110%? I hope so :)
883.
by austinjp 8y ago
> the performance of it is absolutely spectacular Hmm you're not wrong. Re the other comments here about preloading from mouse over events, it's very snappy on mobile too, so there's something else going on as well. Very g
884.
by austinjp 8y ago
Fully agree with this. I'm amazed that even in universities and similar organisations, nobody from Dept X wanders into Dept Y and simply asks "I'm working on this problem, anybody got any ideas?" It happens, but far too
885.
by austinjp 8y ago
Well, progress along the Y axis is only achieved if progress is made on the X axis too. If the curve is too steep, the user is expected to learn too much too quickly, and many will simply give up.
886.
by austinjp 8y ago
/s?
887.
by austinjp 8y ago
Grants, friends and family, network to find one or two individuals, bootstrap. These seem to be the realistic options if you're not exposed to VC (if you even want VC). The problem is how to do all that on top of everything else when t
888.
by austinjp 8y ago
Jeez that's depressing. Old school tie still in effect. Is anyone else running into this? Have to hope that this is a diminishing segment.
889.
by austinjp 8y ago
Definitely worth a go. Comments might be extractable, I'm not familiar with docx format but it's zipped X(?)ML type data so there will be parsers. Or a conversion to an intermediate format that's more amenable to computer pro
890.
by austinjp 8y ago
Well that's a cliffhanger. How would that society be all those things?
891.
by austinjp 8y ago
Genuine question: what do you do with Word docs sent back to you as email attachments with track changes and embedded comments? I'm slowly realising that my colleagues for whom this "works" are never going to change. Our shar
892.
by austinjp 8y ago
Yep: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashcash A mere 20 years ago :)
893.
by austinjp 8y ago
No. OP has described a liar. A truthful version would be "we don't have this but my team can build it". This is not what's happening.
894.
by austinjp 8y ago
Lying to investors is not okay, and OP describes a CEO who they believe is flagrantly lying. This is a kind of "excitement" no company needs.
895.
by austinjp 8y ago
Find what routine works for you, sharpen the saw, take down time. This is great and needs to be said more often to counter the prevailing message of "get up early and do as much as you can".
896.
by austinjp 8y ago
Title is erroneous, it seems. The sheep is hidden in Geneva font. From the article: "The 18 point version of Geneva includes all the characters you’d expect, and then, at position $D9, it has an adorable little sheep, shown at left. Ot
897.
by austinjp 9y ago
Okay didn't realise that, thanks. So it's humans. Well, yes, in that case I fully agree with others' comments about sustainability and scalability.
898.
by austinjp 9y ago
Their front page shows "pullrequest [bot]" commenting on a commit. Very curious as to exactly how they're making that work.
899.
by austinjp 9y ago
Indeed. I'm really curious about the example I saw on their front page, apparently showing a bot commenting that "accessing this ImageView outside the main thread may cause crashes in this app". Is this genuinely possible to
900.
by austinjp 9y ago
Some feedback for you: this is dreadful on mobile. Scrolling is broken, page took like 20 seconds to render what I assume was the main content (coloured blocks with text).

More ›