austin-starks

6 ms·

31.
by austin-starks 2y ago
Just the Google studio! Thankfully, I'm just doing one-shot testing, so the rate limit doesn't slow me down.
32.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is still the best LLM for front end development(medium.com)
3 points by austin-starks 2y ago|3 comments
33.
by austin-starks 2y ago
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is great for the price - V3 is AMAZING for an inexpensive, open-source, non-reasoning model - Grok is not that great - O1-Pro was the worse for this task in terms of cost and efficacy.
34.
I tested out all of the best LLMs for front end development. One model stood out(medium.com)
2 points by austin-starks 2y ago|3 comments
35.
by austin-starks 2y ago
TL;DR Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the best in terms of pure quality and aesthetics. O1-Pro is the worse (both in terms of quality and cost). DeepSeek V3 and Google's 2.5 Pro are the most budget-friendly options. Grok is grokking.
36.
by austin-starks 2y ago
TL;DR: DeepSeek V3 failed so spectacularly on a brain-dead simple task. 2/10, would not use
37.
by austin-starks 2y ago
TL;DR: I shared my experience guest-lecturing at Harvard. I talked about how the professor had a surprise challenge question, and that the app failed to answer correctly in front of the students. I then talked about why it failed, some of m
38.
by austin-starks 2y ago
It's not "the future". It is happening RIGHT NOW. Cope... or use it for yourself
39.
by austin-starks 2y ago
TL;DR, for ambiguous tasks, Claude 3.5 Sonnet performed far better than the other language models. It generated a SQL query that better conformed to the user's input, and created a JSON object that demonstrated superior reasoning skill
40.
by austin-starks 2y ago
Key Points: In a task of generating SQL queries, I found that Google Gemini Flash 2.0 was much better than DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o3-mini. Specifically, I found that it was very significantly cheaper, had a much higher context window, light
41.
by austin-starks 2y ago
Key Points: In a task of generating SQL queries, I found that Google Gemini Flash 2.0 was much better than DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o3-mini. Specifically, I found that it was: * Very significantly cheaper * Had a much higher context window *
42.
I used OpenAI's O3-mini to create a trading strategy. It's DESTROYING the market(nexustrade.io)
2 points by austin-starks 2y ago|1 comments
43.
by austin-starks 2y ago
I wrote this step-by-step guide on how to use O3-mini to create, test, and deploy an algorithmic trading strategy. In my test, I showed that the strategy created by O3 beats the market in every metric, including sharpe ratio, sortino ratio,
44.
by austin-starks 2y ago
TL;DR: OpenAI's o3-mini model is faster, more reliable, and more accurate than DeepSeek's R1
45.
by austin-starks 2y ago
TL;DR: OpenAI's Operator, an AI-powered agent designed to autonomously interact with web browsers to accomplish tasks, fell short of expectations during testing. While it initially impressed with its ability to navigate and gather info
46.
I am among the first to gain access to OpenAI's "Operator". Here are my thoughts(medium.com)
2 points by austin-starks 2y ago|1 comments
47.
by austin-starks 2y ago
It matters because of the ridiculous regulations imposed by the US on China. Even despite them, they've built a better model. I HIGHLY doubt it was built for these type of operations.
48.
by austin-starks 2y ago
I couldn't agree more. China has: * weaker GPUs * a smaller model * started with nothing And now they're building better, faster, and cheaper models at a fraction of the cost. It's hilarious and exciting.
49.
by austin-starks 2y ago
Facts. OpenAI thought they had a moat, but even with the shittiest of GPUs, China managed to developer a better, faster, and cheaper mode, AND they open-sourced it. With that being said, Llama 4 will be CRAZY
50.
China won A side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 vs. OpenAI O1 for Finance(nexustrade.io)
35 points by austin-starks 2y ago|20 comments
51.
by austin-starks 2y ago
I created an app that teaches retail investors how to become Wall Street grade traders. Specifically, I have step-by-step tutorials on how to do the following: * Create an algorithmic trading strategies * Test them on historical data (a pro
52.
I created an app that helps investors deploy no-code algotrading strategies(nexustrade.io)
1 points by austin-starks 2y ago|1 comments