aurhum

9 ms·

31.
Superdielectric materials composed of NaCl, H2O and porous alumina [pdf](arxiv.org)
1 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
32.
Stallman's one mistake(hackaday.com)
11 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
33.
by aurhum 11y ago
original blog post: https://ret2libc.wordpress.com/2016/01/11/a-tale-of-ebay-xss... On my computer the exploit is caught by noscript.
34.
by aurhum 11y ago
The AXIOM, a 4K camera uses a RISC-V http://riscv.org/workshop-jan2016.html
35.
A Still-Growing El Niño Set to Bear Down on U.S(jpl.nasa.gov)
2 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
36.
by aurhum 11y ago
OP may be referring to: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10716102 "15 Biggest Ships Create More Pollution Than All Cars in the World (2013)"
37.
by aurhum 11y ago
Some of the sources used in this article are not at all of the quality I have come to expect from the NY Times. Sources like the Daily Mail and "www.searchautoparts.com".
38.
by aurhum 11y ago
Thanks for that. I tried to find a better link, but my google-fu got stuck in 2015 it seems :)
39.
Quadrantids meteor shower peaks 08:00 UTC (03:00 Eastern US time)(slate.com)
1 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
40.
Open Source Maniac Mansion Engine (SCUMM)(scummvm.org)
2 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
41.
ORNL achieves milestone with plutonium-238 sample(ornl.gov)
45 points by aurhum 11y ago|9 comments
42.
Acetylene Engines(douglas-self.com)
1 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
43.
Gary Powers: The U2 spy pilot the US did not love(bbc.co.uk)
1 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
44.
Eurocopter X³(en.wikipedia.org)
5 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
45.
The beginning of negative campaigning(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
46.
Insects in space (1995)(bio.net)
1 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
47.
by aurhum 11y ago
This was already illegal in pre-WTO times; The European Economic Community filed a complaint under GATT rules (and won).
48.
by aurhum 11y ago
The backdrop (and reason) for this smuggling operation was the 1986 US.-Japan semiconductor trade agreement. A fascinating read can be found here (pdf): http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8717.pdf
49.
Why ISIS has the potential to be a world-altering revolution(aeon.co)
4 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
50.
Esoteric Actuators(hackaday.com)
2 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
51.
by aurhum 11y ago
The cell chemistry only plays an indirect role here (neither zinc nor lithium are terribly healthy in a child's body I guess). The lithium batteries are thrown away with a fair bit of energy remaining: Internal resistance will go up to
52.
by aurhum 11y ago
The article is about lithium-based batteries. Zinc-Air batteries killing children is news to me. link?
53.
by aurhum 11y ago
For more information on these experiments by Eremets & Drozdov: www.nature.com/news/superconductivity-record-sparks-wave-of-follow-up-physics-1.18191 http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08190
54.
The second operating system hiding in every mobile phone(osnews.com)
3 points by aurhum 11y ago|0 comments
55.
by aurhum 11y ago
Yes, those were called S1 players. You could build your own custom firmware for them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S1_MP3_player
56.
by aurhum 11y ago
Here's a 3D schematic of what an Erdstall would look like: https://web.archive.org/web/20151217104816/http://erdstall.d... orange: entrance yellow: shaft used during construction, later filled up
57.
by aurhum 11y ago
At the moment the limiting factor is energy -- The energies required to create these collisions (and hence, the possibility of these new particles) is enormous. In a way that's the only way the LHC exisists; to create higher energy col
58.
by aurhum 11y ago
I respectfully disagree. 1) The Manhattan project is not comparable in scope: Both the UK and France developed nuclear weapons on their own. 2) This is not a European project per se. Most of the developed nations in the world contribute, an
59.
by aurhum 11y ago
really nice, thanks! another client for your timeline: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Internet_Users_Essen...
60.
by aurhum 11y ago
>This is because they are designed to be portable to a wide variety of compilers and target devices which might have limits that weren't envisioned at the time of writing the standard. That's not really the case here, is it? If

More ›