atopal

8 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by atopal 12y ago

   That is exactly the point! In this case, Mozilla does not have leverage. Users have leverage. Chrome and IE users could have decided to abandon those browsers when they implemented the DRM measures. They did not.
2. 62.▲
   by atopal 12y ago

   That is a complete misrepresentation of the situation. This is almost literally a case of "choose your poison" for Mozilla. Abstaining is no way to win. There is no way to win this for Mozilla, damned if they do, damned if they do
3. 63.▲
   by atopal 12y ago

   > in the meantime Firefox and Opera relied on the promise > and then were forced to start implementing support once > they realized Google was not going to keep the promise > and it was hurting them and then included
4. 64.▲
   by atopal 12y ago

   In other words: except where they have any market share at all.
5. 65.▲
   by atopal 12y ago

   Reader mode for desktop is coming (no specific version targeted though). Here is the bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558882 And here are the mock-ups: http://people.mozilla.org/~mmaslaney&#
6. 66.▲
   by atopal 13y ago

   > Excellent news that H.265 has competition, but at the same time I am feeling a bit pessimistic. Daala is not meant to compete with H.265, it's meant to compete with the successor of H.265. As he mentions it won't be ready for