ateeqs

7 ms·

31.
by ateeqs 13y ago
He is educating himself about security? This may actually be a tautology. :) By the way, how many of you guys have read his books? Having actually read Applied Cryptography, I felt his contribution to this field was very little.
32.
by ateeqs 13y ago
I'm not really sure the government is interested. But Schneier seems to think they are though.
33.
by ateeqs 13y ago
Who is "they" and what are "those"? Is "those" referring to zero-day vulnerabilities? You realize that a zero-day vulnerability means "they" accessed "those," right?
34.
by ateeqs 13y ago
I use all OSes. And it matters _very_ little what OS you use. All that matters is how much resource your adversary is willing to expend to get at what it wants. And can you back up your claim of Windows being deliberately backdoored? My thi
35.
by ateeqs 13y ago
And -you- would know that your open source OS does not have backdoors and zero-day vulnerabilities and such? Don't be silly.
36.
by ateeqs 13y ago
Actually, the "ultra paranoid" would live in a cave without computers. You didn't really explain what was wrong with using Windows. Don't be like, "Jesus christ, and he is using Windows !? WTF." without explain
37.
by ateeqs 13y ago
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ir5Xl_mLbkM
38.
by ateeqs 13y ago
Apple can go suck a lemon.
39.
by ateeqs 14y ago
What they are doing is non-sense. First, most of the patents related to MapReduce cannot be patented because they are just patenting algorithms. Second, MapReduce is no different from divide-and-conquer (circa 1945), but people and media hy
40.
by ateeqs 14y ago
I'm waiting for Uniloc's silly patent 5,490,216 to expire in a couple of years. How can they not even have a reference product sold for this?