atat7024

15 ms·

151.
by atat7024 6y ago
Google can't even do PR in the dev community, you want them to solve latency!?
152.
by atat7024 6y ago
> would > was > ran
153.
by atat7024 6y ago
Librem runs Progressive Web Apps.
154.
by atat7024 6y ago
> increasingly Source? Even anecdata? Less apps are required, in lieu of web apps on their websites.
155.
by atat7024 6y ago
Can anyone explain to me the benefits of staying native, and not switching everything to web apps that use properly implemented web APIs for everything?
156.
by atat7024 6y ago
According to Microsoft's actions, PWA (progressive web apps) are "officially" first class citizens: 0) https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/26/20983886/microsoft-outlo... 1) https:/&#x2F
157.
by atat7024 6y ago
> I'm not sure that using a phone that exposes a full Linux system is the answer here or the full list of vulns in the Linux kernel, for that matter.
158.
by atat7024 6y ago
> just by
159.
by atat7024 6y ago
Liquidity, in a word.
160.
by atat7024 6y ago
Check out: https://asteroidos.org/
161.
by atat7024 6y ago
A bibliography isn't going to find the Librem an IOMMU.
162.
by atat7024 6y ago
I don't currently have time to hotlink the absolute latest from security researchers' IRC chats etc direct to your door. All I can do is point.
163.
by atat7024 6y ago
LineageOS breaks the AOSP security model. I wouldn't recommend this to anyone as a first choice.
164.
by atat7024 6y ago
Disclaimer: above commenter is with Purism. See how easy that was? Oh, and telling people not to read resources and decide for themselves is questionable behavior. Doing it without being up front about who you are just makes it rude.
165.
by atat7024 6y ago
> ...are you going to address, you know, the rest of your comment being factually incorrect? Just have elsewhere.
166.
by atat7024 6y ago
> because the document the individual sourced as "fact" was riddled with factual errors. Some of that outdated post's problems could be rectified. Some (important!) ones cannot. As stated elsewhere: wake me up when you hav
167.
by atat7024 6y ago
Not a dev, just a somewhat active community member — would be interested which dev you spoke to, and on what inaccuracy!
168.
by atat7024 6y ago
Chromebooks have this! Some seriously forward thinking shit.
169.
by atat7024 6y ago
Why does everything on the internet have to be a debate? =]
170.
by atat7024 6y ago
> The Assistant craze seems more justified when you consider that companies like Google and Amazon are using it as a way to build datasets. Basically every new goddamn trend that is allowed to occur is about how datasets can be compile
171.
by atat7024 6y ago
> much less malware, if at all Backstabber's Knife Collection: A Review of Open Source Supply Chain Attacks - https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.09535 F-Droid's a great project, but needs to take security more ser
172.
by atat7024 6y ago
Just have him read GrapheneOS.org, look up terms, and ask questions in the chat room until he wants a Pixel, non ironically. Google makes secure hardware!
173.
by atat7024 6y ago
Compared to Samsung Android, sure.
174.
by atat7024 6y ago
See sibling comment!
175.
by atat7024 6y ago
> What would you like to see in Librem's security model? This should cover it nicely: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices
176.
by atat7024 6y ago
"You're wrong!" I can play that game, too!
177.
by atat7024 6y ago
Anyway, to actually answer your question, if you need a source that the Librem doesn't have an IOMMU, then frankly you're out of your depth for this conversation.
178.
by atat7024 6y ago
tl;dr No, I literally said it was from a URL, and provided it...and I'm supposed to trust your info?
179.
by atat7024 6y ago
The Librem 5 is not as open or libre as its marketing has tried to insinuate, simply having its binary blob signed and validated firmware saved in write-protected read-only memory and loaded by a secondary coprocessor to exploit a loophole
180.
by atat7024 6y ago
No. Their security model does not meet the baseline security needs of our clients.

More ›