astro1234

5 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by astro1234 3mo ago

   Why not? I think there’s fairly strong evidence that there is something that convincingly looks like reasoning. I think anthropic has done some nice circuit tracing and mechanistic interpretability work on this for instance.
2. 32.▲
   by astro1234 3mo ago

   One of the highest quality, nuanced strategy docs for this company I’ve ever seen. Cannot poke any holes in this. Also while people very fairly pile onto the Reality Labs disaster, it gave Meta the ray bans which is a durable form factor to
3. 33.▲
   by astro1234 3mo ago

   Did my PhD at Princeton, knew Jenny Greene personally (not my adviser though). There is zero conflict of interest in Astronomy generally. No one has anything to gain. Various institutions, Simons included, are just one source of much needed
4. 34.▲
   by astro1234 3mo ago

   its the only way to study certain things. Can't make up for it with smaller telescopes or cheaper projects.
5. 35.▲
   by astro1234 3mo ago

   Not a dumb defensive question but you should know the nice thing about these experiments is the incredible amount of work that goes into calibration and understanding all error signals. Messing up the data analysis has major precedents. If