Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aspidistra
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
BBC Radio 4: Anti-Establishment and Uber-Capitalist
(bbc.co.uk)
1 points
by
aspidistra
13y ago
|
0 comments
62.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
I can't be the only one who thought of the Mad Men "Carousel" pitch. [1] The stylised photos on this website are in the same genre as those Don Draper used. [1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWyLaXCV2_s
63.
▲
Who Needs Clicks? Blogger Vi Hart Goes Wildly, Dramatically Dull
(npr.org)
1 points
by
aspidistra
13y ago
|
0 comments
64.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
You don't know how long they have been sitting there, or whether they are taking regular stand-up walk-around breaks. It's fine to sit on a bench or a chair for a short period of time. You might as well say they shouldn't all
65.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
http://ismyshiftkeyonornot.com/ ;-)
66.
▲
"New" Pacific Island Consumes Its Neighbor
(earthobservatory.nasa.gov)
4 points
by
aspidistra
13y ago
|
0 comments
67.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
Gandi does, and you do not need to buy webspace from them. Just registering a domain there will get you 5 free mailboxes and 1000 forwarding addresses. https://www.gandi.net/domain
68.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
Thanks for commenting. I don't think there is a misunderstanding, but just to clarify, I was taking issue with the article author's description of Switzerland -- not your choice of where to set up shop. I can see why Switzerland i
69.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
> arrangements are being made to incorporate a nonprofit for Ethereum in the legal free-for-all of Switzerland Swiss Law might be a bit idiosyncratic but I would hardly call it a "legal free-for-all".
70.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
> I think the problem is thinking of people in terms of rankings. Yes, that's exactly what I meant.
71.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
Everyone I meet is not better than me.
72.
▲
Should You Use The Snooze Button?
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
aspidistra
13y ago
|
0 comments
73.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
> Do people really put their photos on their resumes?? Pretty standard practice in Germany.
74.
▲
EuroVoc: multilingual thesaurus of the European Union
(eurovoc.europa.eu)
1 points
by
aspidistra
13y ago
|
0 comments
75.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
You took the words right out of my mouth. The chirpy music, too, but the kid's "How was that?" at the end tipped me over the edge. It's one thing to be fed a dose of cute, another to have a tonne of it shovelled on you.
76.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
> some other gadget tucked in a drawer somewhere in your house It's designed with a loop so you can hook it somewhere handy. They show this in the video at 1m27s.
77.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
For UK readers and or football fans, the Alisher Usmanov mentioned, who now controls VKontakte, is the same Alisher Usmanov who owns a large stake in Arsenal FC. He also owns a stake in Odnoklassniki, another Russian social media site, whi
78.
▲
Canary Islands make Postgres default database
(joinup.ec.europa.eu)
1 points
by
aspidistra
13y ago
|
0 comments
79.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
The link to some videos of it in action is tucked away in the footer on the homepage: http://macaw.co/videos/
80.
▲
Flying Upside Down
(theatlantic.com)
1 points
by
aspidistra
13y ago
|
0 comments
81.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
The Spanish region of Extremadura: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GnuLinEx http://gobex.es/salaprensa/view/press/press/detalle.php?id=8... (I think other Spanish regions have talked a
82.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
You're right: it is wrong to suggest that Google is deliberately malicious here. But again, you can have the best intentions in the world and still be discriminatory. I think it's important to separate the two terms: malicious sug
83.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
> imperfect systems don’t imply malice. ... but they can still discriminate. In some jurisdictions, such as the UK, intention or malice is not required. If Google has a policy or system that disadvantages a group of people who share a pr
84.
▲
by
aspidistra
13y ago
In the UK, at least, "discriminate" is the right word because it is possible to discriminate indirectly. This is defined in law. If you have rules that apply to everyone but disadvantage people who share a protected characteristic