asiando

8 ms·

31.
by asiando 6y ago
The way they framed it is such BS. If he’s a danger to passengers, so are any passengers passing through such “secure area.” It’s not like he snuck in.
32.
by asiando 6y ago
That’s backwards
33.
by asiando 6y ago
If there wasn’t evidence, they wouldn’t approve it. Just find the vaccines’ homepage and follow the footnotes.
34.
by asiando 6y ago
People downvoted you as if this wasn’t a sensible comment. It’s not just “why would” a developer do it; It’s how can they do it without a Mac? They can’t.
35.
by asiando 6y ago
It’s funny that they have their own corner of the web where they own the entire API and the rest have to follow. Just because Mozilla and Apple share most of the API it doesn’t mean that Google won’t change it, in fact Manifest v3 is coming
36.
by asiando 6y ago
Hey check out the App Store, it’s full of paid Safari content-blockers. I begrudgingly bought one on Mac because the alternatives are trash.
37.
by asiando 6y ago
Regular web extension support downloaded from the Chrome web store? I’m interested
38.
by asiando 6y ago
Come on you can’t compare what it takes to submit an update on those two. Literally 5 clicks and drop a zip on the page, so long as they don’t single you out for manual review. Apple requires a thousand clicks, a 11GB app on your computer
39.
Railway: “We identified the source of the issue is [the] ban of Flash content”(twitter.com)
14 points by asiando 6y ago|1 comments
40.
by asiando 6y ago
Everyone trying to be funny here except that you’re all missing the point. That data was public in the first place. These extensions can scrape anything, including your messages.
41.
by asiando 6y ago
Given the speed I’m guessing it was towards S3 so there’s plenty of terabytes.
42.
by asiando 6y ago
Assuming you meant "CSS Transitions": No, jQuery uses requestAnimationFrame. * "CSS transforms" are unrelated to animations.
43.
by asiando 6y ago
Yes but the former will silently fail on you. Good luck finding that!
44.
by asiando 6y ago
Yes it does if you want to be allowed by Gatekeeper. What’s the point of Gatekeeper if getting a new certificate is free? Once your malware is blacklisted you could just use the next one at no cost.
45.
by asiando 6y ago
Plus signing up and paying for a developer ID. While it’s easy to minimize all of this, it’s still red tape and it’s extra work one has to do.
46.
by asiando 6y ago
I’d rather not. After the initial setup I don’t see that many annoying prompts either, I’d rather not disable security measures when they’re really not that painful.
47.
by asiando 6y ago
I don’t know what to think. Per-tweet moderation would be seen as censorship just as well, and would be a pretty interesting exception on Twitter. But also I don’t blame Twitter for finally putting an end to the misery he caused. I blame th
48.
by asiando 6y ago
He did get blamed, but it doesn’t sound like it will hold on court or even for an impeachment. But then again IANAL.
49.
by asiando 6y ago
Well, this POV certainly won’t get buried… /s Rereading the speech I must agree and I don’t know that this will be enough for Trump to be punished in a court. Would “context” and ““knowing they would do it”” be enough to actually blame
50.
by asiando 6y ago
What surprised here is that Android doesn’t have a native QR scanner. I’ve always assumed that iOS was late to the game and that Google Search/Lens handled QRs since 1999. Is that not the case (anymore)?
51.
by asiando 6y ago
The title reads like satire. I don't want to read the rest but I will just assume it's The Onion.
52.
by asiando 6y ago
> My point was credible threatening speech is already illegal in America. So we agree. Trump’s tweets were pretty credible, don’t you think? This whole mess this week happened because of one person who incited violence.
53.
by asiando 6y ago
And that’s fine? What if AWS doesn’t like your business and gives you 24 hours to vacate the premises? I think hosting should be treated like ISPs, which cannot force you out of internet.
54.
by asiando 6y ago
You can look for any slightly controversial company and find that their wiki pages skimp on the details of such controversies and minimize them as mostly resolved
55.
by asiando 6y ago
Yes. If the content is illegal, it's up to the government to censor it.
56.
by asiando 6y ago
I was ok with Facebook doing it, I'm not ok with a hosting kicking a paying customer out like this.
57.
by asiando 6y ago
Jokes aren’t included. However some jokes already are illegal or at the very least will get you in trouble, for example there’s one word you can’t joke about in airports.
58.
by asiando 6y ago
It’s pretty simple, really. “I hate Bob” is fine. “Bob should die” isn’t. Some tweets don’t need to exist because it might lead Bob to be killed, especially when said by someone with a cult-like following.
59.
by asiando 6y ago
A better way to put it is that Facebook let it happen rather than make it happen. I don’t know whether Facebook is directly responsible any more than Jonh Walker is directly responsible for car accidents. In both cases it’s the product’
60.
by asiando 6y ago
I’d rather keep my Facebook groups and have Facebook manually quarantine misinformation groups and pages instead, in a way similar to how Reddit does it. I don’t think we should reduce public liberties because some people take advantage o

More ›