aselimov3

6 ms·

31.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
I’ve always thought that this is the argument people that say AI is conscious are making without realizing. It’s also utter hogwash. Writing an article to argue against your own consciousness/free will is such an incoherent action that
32.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
Very curious to see how efficient this will be in practice
33.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
Is this much different than ziglings?
34.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
> People stop creating music, stop writing blogs, stop doing experiments or any other cool stuffs and share it on the internet because LLM companies can just pirate the shit out of it without paying anything back. This isn’t necessarily
35.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
Even if it was forever is run by community really that great? The code is open source so a fork can happen at any time if it goes down the wrong path. Once you get a wide community involved I feel like decision making slows down. And the pr
36.
Kagi Search, human connection, and why LLMs are not a good search replacement(alexselimov.com)
4 points by aselimov3 4mo ago|0 comments
37.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
Why doesn’t this link the project?
38.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
This is pretty cool but how strong is the overlap between developers and people writing recipes?
39.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
I don’t receive that much personal communication that’s AI copy paste. It is somewhat easy to tell when someone is writing with AI. I usually don’t read articles that have strong AI tells for example
40.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
I don’t use ai for any human to human communications. I don’t even really use it for grammar anymore. I’d rather post my own authentic style (blunders and all) then get my thoughts blended by the language grinder into sludge
41.
by aselimov3 4mo ago
This is definitely the way. I don’t think long term that full agentic engineering without writing code is sustainable. I think it definitely leads to atrophy
42.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
This is quality
43.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
This is such a bad take it’s crazy. Assuming a higher IQ person has better long horizon thinking and levels of abstraction seems blatantly false. Recent example is SBF (and crypto buddies) who probably had a high IQ but had pretty short ter
44.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
I like Hugo for my personal site but getting exposure is a little hard. I don’t want to constantly blast my blog everywhere
45.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
Good reasonable take. I think the tradeoff on AI automation is trading skill development, brain muscle growth, and technical understanding for speed. You have to balance it so you are net faster but also growing. Otherwise you are just indi
46.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
Missing the link
47.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
Site broken for me
48.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
lol paid 1k to play doom with worse performance probably
49.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
Man that’s a hard one because personal browsing for things like banking would require a GUI. But I could use a separate machine for that. This is a pretty decent experiment to run.
50.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
I was mainly just speaking to the point of the article with regards to ability to think about code/solve technical problems. I think most EMs I speak to would say their technical skill set is degraded from years not writing code. I thi
51.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
> Sometimes I get the "you're right!" response, but often it will also explain why it made the decision it did, and it's rational enough that I accept the new approach. I think this is kind of what I’m worried about.
52.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
But the specs can’t be fully detailed or else they would just be code which is the point the article above makes. You can certainly limit where the LLMs have freedom by writing more detail but obviously that defeats the purpose of LLMs. Wha
53.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
That’s a good point but I think this article above would push back on this point slightly. I certainly am able to do a lot more with LLMs because it can produce a passable solution in a lot of places but I’m not sure it expands my solution
54.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
I think the main issue with this approach is that your solution space eventually narrows. You go from formulating unique solutions to flagging things that look wrong and then just picking an alternative LLM generated one. I’ve noticed this
55.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
This is very true. I haven’t tried the deleting and retyping from memory but I plan to start. I’ve gone back to setting aside blocks of time where I use no llms and read documentation to solve my problems like a caveman. Even if some of the
56.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
It feels like with this monitor the only thing you can really do is a terminal. Would really help with focusing I think. Less colors/distractions. Although I’m sure hn would work fine on it haha
57.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
If only I could justify the 2k. I feel like life quality would improve significantly if I had this. Do you use another monitor for calls for work?
58.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
I did the same thing! https://www.alexselimov.com/posts/ai_confession/ I don’t think it’s even necessarily safe to use it as a grammar checker because it will offer phrase changes that are hard to deny. Then you s
59.
by aselimov3 5mo ago
What on earth is this?
60.
Handling the great code forge fragmentation(alexselimov.com)
3 points by aselimov3 5mo ago|0 comments

More ›