asddubs

62 ms·

841.
by asddubs 4y ago
mobile first css was really useful when stuff like grid wasn't well supported everywhere yet. you could stick stuff in a @supports block, and older browsers just get the mobile view instead, which usually doesn't need grid. But ye
842.
by asddubs 4y ago
anything that converts electricity to heat, by whatever means, is essentially equally efficient in doing so.
843.
by asddubs 4y ago
Signal's stance on third party clients is so disappointing. Telegram really has them beat there, although it has to be pointed out that Signal actually publishes server source, while Telegram doesn't.
844.
by asddubs 4y ago
well, if he was going to be running a space heater otherwise then this is basically the least harmful instance of mining
845.
by asddubs 4y ago
isn't a better precaution to not store stuff on your stovetop
846.
by asddubs 4y ago
and to dress for the occasion: * html { _background:black !ie; }
847.
by asddubs 4y ago
tomato, tomato
848.
by asddubs 4y ago
yeesh, ie9, my condolences.
849.
by asddubs 4y ago
They both have some parallels to IE in their own ways. Chrome for the reasons you mentioned, safari because: -Coupled to OS updates, meaning that people on older versions of the OS will also have an older browser, with worse standards suppo
850.
by asddubs 4y ago
>For those who don't get it, in the late 90's there was a distinct sense that internet websites might just solve all of the world's problems, and we just hadn't imagined yet how it was going to happen, and most people
851.
by asddubs 4y ago
that's an attitude that seems to accepts the consequences for those being harassed as collateral without giving it much thought, though
852.
by asddubs 4y ago
>Shed with gaps inbetween the walls large enough you can see in from the outsides? if it makes you feel any better, there's advantages to that too. If the wind can get through it, it's unlikely that moisture will be trapped ins
853.
by asddubs 4y ago
that's the struggle of learning any new skill, though. at first you're going to suck, and you're gonna know you suck, but you have to keep going to stop sucking eventually. same with programming.
854.
by asddubs 4y ago
unless you happen to own freenode/libera.chat, you don't own your own platform on IRC either. same for mastodon, unless you happen to own the mastodon instance you're on, you don't own it. And the old web had plenty of p
855.
by asddubs 4y ago
well, if you don't have type annotations, nothing is enforced, obviously. but you can pretty easily make it legacy-code compatible by just having type annotations be optional, but enforced if present
856.
by asddubs 4y ago
the proposal is for type annotations, which are to be treated as comments. i want type checking to be done in the browser, whether it's before the javascript is run or at runtime isn't important, the point is that i want the brows
857.
by asddubs 4y ago
adding type annotations to your code is opting in. if you don't want it, you can leave them out, or have them be removed during bundling. what's the point of having annotations that do nothing?
858.
by asddubs 4y ago
browsers are very conservative about breaking changes. javascript features that allow for loose and questionable usage is the thing that got us into this mess in the first place. once this is out there, there will be code using it in the mo
859.
by asddubs 4y ago
the moment they add this to javascript, there will be people out there feeding strings to number-annotated parameters of functions (and so on). and then of course no one is going to want to break existing code. that's why doing this in
860.
by asddubs 4y ago
I think it doesn't really matter one way or the other, anyway. Even if it takes 10 years to proliferate, at some point in the future, it'll be 10 years from now, and we'll be able to use it. depending on your usecase, maybe s
861.
by asddubs 4y ago
it should also be enforced by the language. and then you can still check and remove it using a transpiler, if you want (for smaller sizes + speedup due to lack of type checks). but if you're gonna add type annotations, they should do
862.
by asddubs 4y ago
I don't want this. I want real types, that are checked and throw errors, or are at least coerced on being passed into/out of methods (preferably the former) If you don't want to take the performance hit of type checks, you ca
863.
by asddubs 4y ago
i'm bilingual too, i just deactivated autocorrect. it's too frustrating
864.
by asddubs 4y ago
does this allow only open source extensions, or proprietary ones as well? If it's the latter, is there a way to filter for only foss extensions? I don't use vscode/vscodium mostly because I didn't want to get suckered in
865.
by asddubs 4y ago
used to love this kind of stuff, but to be honest, youtube clickbait has kind of sucked the joy out of most intentionally ridiculous projects for me, by sheer oversaturation, or maybe just because a lot of it seems kind of insincere these d
866.
by asddubs 4y ago
that's hilarious. what would a dealership even do with that information, seethe? call them out?
867.
by asddubs 4y ago
yup, I still use one too. it's great, way better than google maps. But I'm guessing it's a hard pitch to get people to even try a dedicated device for something they already have in their pocket, for free.
868.
by asddubs 4y ago
IMO this is too big a misstep to play that card. if your support is too unconditional, you may end up with privacy theather instead of privacy. but we shall see what the future holds
869.
by asddubs 4y ago
good call editing out "I'm sorry you feel that way."
870.
by asddubs 4y ago
Yes, sorry, that was my roundabout way of saying that. Whenever phpmyadmin gets on my mind I just see red and wake up in a pool of sweat, several hours later, without any memory of what happened.

More ›