asattarmd

15 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by asattarmd 13y ago

   > Starting with the Erlang website makes eminent sense Of course it does. But stopping at the Erlang website because of the website makes much less sense. Find some other way to know more about the language and then decide whether you&#x
2. 62.▲
   by asattarmd 13y ago

   Ffs, you're not looking at some small product that an unknown company built. You're looking at something that is really well-known. What does the website of Google convey? Do you really decide whether you'd learn a language b
3. 63.▲
   by asattarmd 13y ago

   I see nothing that makes this library "functional".
4. 64.▲
   by asattarmd 13y ago

   The best intro for functional programming, IMO, is Joel Spolsky's "Can your language do this" ( http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/08/01.html ).
5. 65.▲
   by asattarmd 13y ago

   I don't think there are a lot of jobs in Haskell. Yesod/Snap/Happstack(/Scotty) are the only web frameworks and I can count only three companies (not blogs or framework websites) that use Haskell to serve websites. And
6. 66.▲
   by asattarmd 13y ago

   tl;dr They are realtime. They don't want full blown Rest frameworks for just reactive views. So, no AngularJS or EmberJS. What about Knockout.js? It's just 16kb.