asadm

12 ms·

151.
by asadm 1y ago
thats your concern as a dev sending a patch to your repo., your IDE doesn't "address" attacks.
152.
by asadm 1y ago
then we need new bench.
153.
by asadm 1y ago
ooh I like my ctrl-R in gemini cli. Good that it lands here too.
154.
by asadm 1y ago
meh more of a bearish signal. evil using shitty evil tech.
155.
by asadm 1y ago
Less riddly: Don't take money if you don't need it. if you have to, take it from people who have values/incentives (with life and business both) aligned with you.
156.
by asadm 1y ago
Product hunt was always "artificial". Having done a few launches there, I highly prefer doing an HN launch. HN yields more traffic anyway (like x3-x10 more depending on what you launched).
157.
by asadm 1y ago
ooh a web version would be insanely cool.
158.
by asadm 1y ago
> at least try to this. they try to be un-opinionated. The difference is of taste.
159.
by asadm 1y ago
How blind are most developers to UX being a primary selling point.
160.
by asadm 1y ago
This is insanely good work and timeline. Kudos there! BUT, this will soon be a dead thing once these agents land in devices natively (like in <1year or so). So use this expertise you gained at creating a hardware and redirect it elsewher
161.
by asadm 1y ago
that clip reminds me of how Sundar reacts to these things.
162.
by asadm 1y ago
and so boring. I would take Jobs presenting a live demo than any of this heavily-produced stuff.
163.
by asadm 1y ago
this isn't cheating. the models are unpredictable. This product is going out the door this month, there is no reason to cheat.
164.
by asadm 1y ago
thats even worse. 0 TOPS! The whole point is offloading load from CPU and doing something in parallel while NPU does its thing.
165.
by asadm 1y ago
no its not. Just use a smaller rockchip, 1-2 actual TOPS in ~$20 as a board or $10 a piece. i am using one for my project.
166.
by asadm 1y ago
2 TOPS is not a lot for AI projects.
167.
by asadm 1y ago
this + any coding conventions should ALWAYS be a post process. DO NOT include them in your prompt, you are losing model accuracy over these tiny things.
168.
by asadm 1y ago
it doesnt make sense to rewrite those boring parts.
169.
by asadm 1y ago
yes! for extremely precise edits.
170.
by asadm 1y ago
this is amazing. I just wish models would have more non-textual controls. I don't want to TYPE my instructions. We need a better UI for editing images with AI.
171.
by asadm 1y ago
Has anyone deployed jetson or similar in production? whats the BOM like at scale?
172.
by asadm 1y ago
I think caution is good here. We all saw what reckless admin + Uber did before they shut it down for good.
173.
by asadm 1y ago
well sure i may have oversimplified it. the shareholder is usually me :)
174.
by asadm 1y ago
as opposed to fluff like "make world a better place"?
175.
by asadm 1y ago
depends. if i am converting it to then use it in my project, i don't care who writes it, as long as it works.
176.
by asadm 1y ago
i think you are mis-categorizing me. i have been programming for fun since i was a kid. But that doesn't mean i solve mundane boring stuff even though i know i can get someone else or ai to figure those parts out so i can do the fun st
177.
by asadm 1y ago
I have found that whenever it fails for me, it's likely that I was trying to one-shot the solution and I retry by breaking the problem into smaller chunks or doing a planning work with gemini cli first.
178.
by asadm 1y ago
> AI is better doing other things... I agree. For me the other things are non-business logic, build details, duplicate/bootstrap code that isn't exciting.
179.
by asadm 1y ago
> If these activities don't interest you, why are you in this field? I am in this field to deliver shareholder value. Writing individual lines of code; unless absolutely required, is below me?
180.
by asadm 1y ago
I think you and I are having very different experiences with these copilot/agents. So I have questions for you, how do you: - generate new modules/classes in your projects - integrate module A into module B or entire codebase A in

More ›