arunoda

33 ms·

331.
by arunoda 14y ago
Thanks. Pardon me for my bad english (I'm from Asia) >"it's not there and this is how it should be" This seems okay for me. Will add it now.
332.
by arunoda 14y ago
Thanks. Yes I agree with you. But It's a random idea I got while watching a video by Google which says Build NodeJS apps on Chrome. (But it does nothing rather than using Browserify) I really don't need people to fork and send me pull reque
333.
by arunoda 14y ago
this is just an idea. I don't anyone to code for me. :)
334.
by arunoda 14y ago
Yes. No offence on that. But if its with Chrome, users can install the app just visiting the Chrome App Store.
335.
by arunoda 14y ago
It is available in the canary build of chrome. I'm not sure about the stable version.
336.
by arunoda 14y ago
Cool :)
337.
NodeJS Runtime for Chrome(github.com)
10 points by arunoda 14y ago|22 comments
338.
Google Remote Desktop via Chrome [Stable](chrome.google.com)
4 points by arunoda 14y ago|0 comments
339.
Which branch to select for rebasing?(stackoverflow.com)
2 points by arunoda 14y ago|0 comments
340.
by arunoda 14y ago
Wow superb. This is very attractive for a website and would love to use. But this might not be usable for a Web App, but there may be some situations.
341.
by arunoda 14y ago
This is all bad code practices. Why use eval since we have a fast JSON parser. Why use map/reduce for user interaction queries. Since we have mongo's JSON based querying. Btw. Mongo can also vurnable to JSON queries with taking query JSON d
342.
by arunoda 14y ago
I hope ORDER BY, LIMIT and SELECT also can be easily converted to mongo's query API. JOIN is the hardest part, I think.
343.
by arunoda 14y ago
Is there any possibility to translate SQL to Mongo's JS Query API (or may be to map/reduce)?
344.
by arunoda 14y ago
Okay. I think this discussion leads to something not useful. :) We have CofeeScript, TypeScript, LLJS (have no idea when this will be usefull), Sweet JS. So It's about choices. That is good.
345.
by arunoda 14y ago
No. I never want to say TypeScript is bad or not. But I wan't to say is, Mozilla is trying to do something competitive with TypeScript or may be with CoffeScript. Which is really good.
346.
by arunoda 14y ago
Agree.
347.
by arunoda 14y ago
As others said, why not bootstrap?
348.
by arunoda 14y ago
I think they don't mean to give it away free in the long run. They did it for redactor[1] too. (I think it is the full featured awesome and simple WYSIWYG editor) It's totally upto the developer to decide upon on the licence. There are lot
349.
by arunoda 14y ago
LLJS and Now Sweet JS Seems like mozilla is trying to answer TypeScript. Which is really good.
350.
Create Node apps with TypeScript(github.com)
2 points by arunoda 14y ago|0 comments
351.
by arunoda 14y ago
I'm on Lion too. It works for me. Look here - http://osxdaily.com/2012/06/09/mac-screen-blurry-optimize-tr... I steal it from there.
352.
by arunoda 14y ago
Very informative. Thanks.
353.
by arunoda 14y ago
Seems like that's why they are investing more on Retina displays.
354.
by arunoda 14y ago
I found some command on the web to change the font smoothness. Here is it and with option 1. It looks quite great than earlier. defaults -currentHost write -globalDomain AppleFontSmoothing -int 1
355.
by arunoda 14y ago
That means this is a well known issue?
356.
Font Rendering - Mac vs Ubuntu(arunoda.me)
52 points by arunoda 14y ago|43 comments
357.
PacketPub celebrate 1000th Book - Ask us to download a book for free (packtpub.com)
1 points by arunoda 14y ago|0 comments
358.
by arunoda 14y ago
Yes this is something general but no one actually tells you you thiswhrb starting node.
359.
Writing Better NodeJS(arunoda.me)
1 points by arunoda 14y ago|2 comments
360.
NodeJS Design Patterns 101(arunoda.me)
3 points by arunoda 14y ago|0 comments

More ›