arunmu

7 ms·

31.
by arunmu 10y ago
> Moves are runtime moves, so you can still attempt to access the value at compile time. What do you mean by that ? Are you saying the standard decided to make it non-destructive moves ? Then yes, it is a possible scenario for error but
32.
by arunmu 10y ago
I do not contest on the opinion that Rust is a good language, but it slightly hurts me when people club C and C++ together. One can easily write correct by construction code using modern C++. Use of meta-programs allows you to create typesa
33.
by arunmu 10y ago
If its written in python all they have to do is `import soul` ;)
34.
by arunmu 10y ago
How and who allowed them to publish such a ridiculous paper !!?? There is so many un-idiomatic C++ code... And does the topic even fit to be published as part of ACM ??
35.
C++ – Implementation details of libstd++ std::function(templated-thoughts.blogspot.com)
1 points by arunmu 10y ago|0 comments
36.
C++(11/14) std::function performance benchmark(templated-thoughts.blogspot.com)
1 points by arunmu 10y ago|0 comments
37.
What you need _not_ know about std::function (C++)(templated-thoughts.blogspot.com)
2 points by arunmu 10y ago|0 comments
38.
by arunmu 10y ago
Yeah. That would be really nice as these languages are competing for the same ground. Go beats all in ease of programming but something is not quite satisfying with it(my personal opinion). I really like having control of my memory. But tha
39.
by arunmu 10y ago
Would love to repeat this sometime using pure modern C++.