aroch

46 ms·

1. 451.▲
   by aroch 12y ago

   They are still, in comparison to mobile phone SoCs, incremental increases in power. Especially the Core-i series of the last few years. On top of that they still sell computers with dual-core celeron and pentium processors because they&#x
2. 452.▲
   by aroch 12y ago

   You can't have your cake and eat it to; either everyone follows all the traffic laws (including you) or no one follows all the traffic laws.
3. 453.▲
   by aroch 12y ago

   Because smartphones are in the exponential phase of development, much like computers were in the late 90's early 00's. Smartphone silicon has changed dramatically in the last 4 years, laptop silicon has not.
4. 454.▲
   by aroch 12y ago

   Google's providing the OS support -- they make money on you using their services. Even if the revenue per user is only ¢10/year, when you get 100's of millions to billions of users that adds up.
5. 455.▲
   by aroch 12y ago

   I use Firefox on my Android phones, it's come a long way since its first release and is pleasantly stable and comparably quick to chrome.
6. 456.▲
   by aroch 12y ago

   Bindshells are shells that are bound to a port, see Wiki for a brief explanation[1]. Basically, without authentication you have no way of knowing that the `ls` you backed up is the same `ls` you get back out. If your remote backup is compro
7. 457.▲
   by aroch 12y ago

   I mean, you're not totally wrong... Fruits like strawberries prioritize the localization of their sugars towards the outside of the fruit -- where the seeds are (The opposite is true for thick-rinded fruits like melons). Whole-fruit sw
8. 458.▲
   by aroch 12y ago

   One of my throwaway gmail's is in the leak, the password matches the password I gave at devicescape.com
9. 459.▲
   by aroch 12y ago

   It uses Apple HTTP-LiveStream library which only Safari has support for (even though its opensource and unencumbered)... It has little to do with lock in
10. 460.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    I'm fairly certain they just want you to land on the live page, even if you can't view it in the current browser. It's about eyes on page to spur you to either stay tuned or move to a browser that works with it.
11. 461.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Or lazy about their redirecting. 301's are supported by pretty much every browser, indexer and wget/curl whereas 302's sometimes fail on those. Its also pretty easy to reissue another 301 from /live to com/
12. 462.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Use VLC, give it the livestream URI (inspect element on the QT inset).
13. 463.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Apple.com/ has been redirecting to apple.com/live for about ~20 hours now. They're very confident about what's about to be presented.
14. 464.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Plex however relies on you either have 1) a good home connection (with no caps) or 2) a server "in the cloud(tm)". Dropbox provides the backend hosting, which makes providing the data files easier.
15. 465.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    They're a horrible balance, a proper SD rip will look better than a Yify encode
16. 466.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    No...I'd rather not watch something fuzzy. If you think it looks OK, then you may as well download proper SD rips. They'll look better with less artifacting.
17. 467.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Disable "Enable zero-copy rasterizer" in chrome and give it another try. Its likely hitting the integrated graphics and not discrete or CPU, leading to the less than awesome FPS
18. 468.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Yify torrents are total garbage at any rate, you'd be better off just not watching whatever you wanted to watch rather than stare at the eyesore that is Yify. Seriously, Yify encodes are like watching something through a window coated
19. 469.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Instead of bending everything to fit your wished narrative so you can be dismissive why don't you actually read the comments or ask them? Many of them, like myself, use "last years" flagships that were in the 4.7" range
20. 470.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    >What I don't understand is why these TVs don't have a DP input so we can use them at 60fps with modern PCs (and already on the market GPUs). Probably because every TV maker / rebrander and their mother has both an HDMI li
21. 471.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    I didn't provide the link...Try reading usernames
22. 472.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    1. It's not my link 2. Running OSX on standard hardware, Apple OEM or not, is not very hard...
23. 473.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    You don't have to own a Mac to own an Apple keyboard - they're compatible with Windows, OSX and many flavors of nix
24. 474.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Its certainly for DRM reasons. HBO, Netflix, and a host of other services support casting
25. 475.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Buying things on amazon
26. 476.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    I would imagine its because the continued and unexpected maintenance of things at the bottom of the ocean is much harder
27. 477.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Yeah, I see how my wording is confusing. I've edited my post to use leaking instead of exposing
28. 478.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    The entire premise is that somehow hole punching is dangerous and unstoppable with webrtc. Enterprise grade NAT environments can easily deal with both STUN and TURN hole punching. If leaking internal IP's from your network is a securit
29. 479.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Uh, that entire article is FUD and bullshit.
30. 480.▲
    by aroch 12y ago

    Disabling media.peerconnect does nothing to improve your anonymity. peerconnect (and, well, all websockets datachannels) requires user action to be enabled