Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aristofun
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
aristofun
4mo ago
That is a pretty stupid comment and a bad analogy, to be honest
62.
▲
by
aristofun
4mo ago
Yes, founding engineer math doesn’t work. Its a way to buy you cheaper than market can offer for comparable work/risks.
63.
▲
by
aristofun
4mo ago
Okay. Cause it still feels like running on a potato phone on latest iphone :)
64.
▲
by
aristofun
4mo ago
Whatsapp, really?
65.
▲
by
aristofun
4mo ago
I think HN “crowd” on average is smarter than a random or some hype eating crowd on the internet. Smarter people tend to be more sceptical and resistive when something gets shoved up their bottoms too much or much more than it seemingly des
66.
▲
by
aristofun
4mo ago
Philosophically or metaphorically speaking - yes. But in my comment it is literally what some subset of lawyers do. Literally is much more tangible and risky in terms of real impact on employment etc.
67.
▲
by
aristofun
4mo ago
Thank you! As a non native speaker I was not sure if “and butter” is a mandatory part but didn’t want (nor had time) to llm the comment for the sake of authenticity :) TIL
68.
▲
by
aristofun
4mo ago
In general it is not surprising. Even if this particular study is bad. There are certain areas of law work that are about analyzing large amounts of texts, drawing conclusions and writing other texts based on that and nothing more. That is
69.
▲
by
aristofun
5mo ago
I was successful since the moment I was born.
70.
▲
by
aristofun
5mo ago
Because modern so called atheists is a popular religious cult of its own, they tend to cancel anyone challenging it, because of lack of better arguments.
71.
▲
by
aristofun
5mo ago
> It is hopelessly self-centered to claim that they were made in God's image. Much less self centered than assume we’re developed from a mud on our own, without any external intervention. > It is hopelessly self-centered to claim
72.
▲
by
aristofun
5mo ago
Yeah it’s funny to compare yourself now when you touched some real thinkers and real wisdom and years ago when you thought charlatans like Dawkins were worth trusting :)
73.
▲
by
aristofun
5mo ago
Natural scientist by education and degrees and raised in implicitly atheistic soviet family in my pursuit of truth I started noticing more and more evidence of the world picture without God not making much sense and fundamentally incomplete
74.
▲
by
aristofun
5mo ago
How this works technically? Is it an mcp every llm must connect to?
75.
▲
by
aristofun
5mo ago
It’s nice. But unless they commit to bring back reliable and comfortable cars - who cares?
76.
▲
by
aristofun
6mo ago
> This leads me to believe that most people either get lucky and then apply a framework in retrospect to justify their luck Yes, congratulations on finding the truth. This is the pattern 95% of business, psychology and other pseudoscienc
77.
▲
by
aristofun
6mo ago
I’m not dismissive, i refute the point OP was worried being true about
78.
▲
by
aristofun
6mo ago
Extremely ignorant point of view. Author obviously never launched anything beyond a hellow world
79.
▲
by
aristofun
6mo ago
It’s sad but at the same time reassuring to see more and more of your childhood “heros” revealing their ignorance and lack of wisdom.
80.
▲
by
aristofun
6mo ago
How do you solve HA?
81.
▲
by
aristofun
6mo ago
> It is about the thought leaders becoming dumb As i said “they are getting power”. Through exposure, normalization, through all the dumb people getting vote rights (and voting guess how) etc. Nothing is poisoned in tge human nature. It
82.
▲
by
aristofun
6mo ago
I don’t share any of the pessimism. If you are at least tiny bit curious about looking beyond your IT bubble you know that the majority of population has always been dumb. It’s just biological fact of life. For better or worse hundreds year
83.
▲
by
aristofun
7mo ago
It’s easy and hard at the same time. Eady because you derive that directly from your hierarchy of values. Hard because you can’t just “decide” what your hierarchy of values is. There is a significant transcendental part to it that criticall
84.
▲
by
aristofun
7mo ago
Yes I didn’t finish it. If only few scenes are worth watching it’s not a movie it’s a bunch of clips
85.
▲
by
aristofun
7mo ago
One of the boring and meaningless movies I ever seen. No arc, no coherent story, (almost) no humor, no development, no intrigue, nothing. Only nice picture - then it qualifies as a good YouTube video, not really a movie. Because movies have
86.
▲
by
aristofun
7mo ago
Americans have an amazing trait to make money and marketing bullshit out of almost any idea, however great or silly it originally is. In the process they usually spoil and dumb down it to the point of making no sense (but making more money)
87.
▲
by
aristofun
7mo ago
Not correct
88.
▲
by
aristofun
7mo ago
wrong Here are only some examples of Israel compromising (land and other) for the sake of peace: 1. Hebron Protocol — 1997 2. Wye River Memorandum — 1998 3. Sharm el-Sheikh Memorandum — 1999 4. Gaza Disengagement Plan — 2005 5. Naharayim&#x
89.
▲
by
aristofun
7mo ago
> Why don't you withdraw within your borders? They already did that multiple times with no positive outcomes whatsoever, go learn some history
90.
▲
by
aristofun
7mo ago
> I have always enjoyed the journey Don't take it personally, but those are the worst kind of engineers in any real world business context. I watched those type of people ruining projects, companies by overengineering them to death
More ›