Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
arghwhat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
211.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
> Regular people also commit fraud which can make some differences here. Yeah, but it's hard for a regular person to under/overreport a property by, say, 200 million USD, and most people do not have the power to negotiate with
212.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
No no, you integrate the pump directly into the tree. Skip the farms, just plant the trees at the station in place of the current pumps.
213.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
Shock and uncertainty causes large dips in the stock market. As as long as the economy isn't completely toast by the time you backpedal completely, it'll recover somewhat. Just imagine the money you could make if you could induce
214.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
They don't really. They misreport the value for tax purposes, they own it through some other legal entity that is all negative, they own it through a company that negotiated tax rates to have some other business happen there, they own
215.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
Oh they do, and you probably have several of them installed...
216.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
The shops you're thinking of are less of a sweat shop than, say, Amazon in the US. Theres no good wages, but factory jobs don't really pay well anywhere. They're mostly just a lot more efficient at scale, with a few plants
217.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
Most wealthy people are not billionaire wealthy. Billionaire wealthy pretty much manage to avoid all taxation, progressive or not, so the comparison is moot. They just trample on everyone else.
218.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
Tariffs like this is a market regulation that the people pays for. It doesn't "benefit the wealthy" because it's not progressive, it benefits the wealthy that have investments in the tariffed industry by distorting the m
219.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
I find this logic extremely flawed. If you save half, you save half. If someone saves a lot more than you as a result, it mains they paid a lot more before, and is still paying a lot more than you now. As fair as it gets. Those that complai
220.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
Note that while you have 25% VAT on things, actual VAT accounting is fully dynamic and banking and accounting systems handle this just fine. On the incoming side, bills can come from other countries with an entirely arbitrary VAT value, so
221.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
For any radio system, receiving continuously also kills battery, just not as fast as transmitting does. Low-power requires you to turn the receiver off for extended periods of time, but what you can do there is limited by how interactive th
222.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
Not to mention flat-earthers, climate change deniers, 5G-causes-vaccines activists burning down 4G towers as they have no idea what 5G even is, etc., etc. It's all too easy for the less skeptical to be misguided. :/
223.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
That's really doesn't apply to water vapor where the natural evaporation is many orders if magnitude grater than what were dealing with, and is a required part of the natural cycle to replenish water reservoirs, with the natural
224.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
And sunlight causes skin cancer, but we don't want to boycott neither water vapor nor sunlight lest we will have no precipitation and no... life. Water evaporates constantly in from soil, plants, and water bodies - most notably from th
225.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
The water cycle refills drained reservoirs - the "carbon cycle" is not one we want to be part of. Also note that there's other cooling solutions than evaporative cooling, such as closed loop water cooling with chillers, coo
226.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
Water availability is a regional climate change impact, which does not apply everywhere due to differences in water sourcing and weather patterns and how climate change affects these. It's very stupid to evaporate potable water on purp
227.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
The way pan-and-scroll works in every other CAD program has been that zooming with the cursor off-center is a panning zoom (zoom centering on the cursor position), without the cursor warping anywhere, so that seems like a reasonable behavio
228.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
s/KiCAD needs/KiCAD wants/ As a user of KiCAD, I have not found any need for it to automatically move cursors or windows around (nor do I even remember such behaviour pre-wayland, so it can't have been important), but no
229.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
That is highly dependent on the exact ESP32 model and current power state. They can use in excess of 500mA with peaks of 800mA, and can easily use >250mA constant at 3.3V. Some draw much more than that. A board with a few bits and bo
230.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
Assuming decent cells with low ESR (say, <30mOhm), one such cell will deliver hundreds of amps when shorted, making things a little bit more lively than your estimation. :) (A few hundred amps isn't a lot for a shorted battery, bu
231.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
But note that for Denmark, it's only correct by default in simple employment cases without notable investment, retirement, transport/house/mortgage related deductibles, etc. And it's not at all simple once you have to ac
232.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
> How do you know if the phone doesn’t have an appropriate focal length if the image isn’t marked? I listed focal lengths for an iPhone 16 Pro Max, and good focal lengths for flattering portrait photography is common photography knowledg
233.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
I'd agree if the phone had an appropriate focal length, but it doesn't. You can either go way too wide, or way too narrow (with a worse image sensor at that). Comparing the best the phone can sensibly do while handicapping the
234.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
> Most appropriate length for what? Some iPhones have multiple focal lengths, ... Most appropriate length for portrait photography is well established to be somewhere between 50mm and 100mm (35mm equivalent). The lower end is often consi
235.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
If you truly mean tolerate , then your sensitivity might be a bit in the extreme. I wouldn't expect anyone to be bothered by eating a bit of pure sugar or honey even if they prefer their food unsweetened. But yes, a lot of food is exc
236.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
One important note (also mentioned in the study) is that this may be a reverse causality. Their study also indicates an association between high Artificially Sweetened Beverage ("ASB" in the study) consumption and high total cal
237.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
I mean, it's not like you, your dad, girlfriend or anyone would be planning to perform possibly illegal culling of some species, now would you...??? There's lots of little privileges like this that only seem to apply to politician
238.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
As a Dane, we're sorry - democracy is imperfect and it seems that being a politician requires technological incompetence and immunity to silly things like numbers and facts . :(
239.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
> but I'd feel the same about the prospect of loosing ripgrep for a week, or whatever. Loosing it for a couple of days is more palatable. Just to nitpick: When the limit is a week, going over it does not mean losing access for a wee
240.
▲
by
arghwhat
1y ago
While it's a common joke, not quite - if you're hit by baseball, your velocity does not change significantly as energy is dissipated in other ways, and the change in velocity of the baseball is a consequence of the lost energy, no
More ›