areyousure

39 ms·

391.
by areyousure 11y ago
I don't understand. The alternative, as I detailed above, is "you get 1000 options per month for the next four years", which is also time-limited.
392.
by areyousure 11y ago
Why can't I be told what the strike price will be for the options for the next four years?
393.
by areyousure 11y ago
Why is it phrased as 1/48 of my (say) 48000 optipns/shares vest rather than a fixed amount of 1000 options/shares are awarded every month? Alternatively, why aren't salary offers phrased as "you will get $640,000, w
394.
by areyousure 11y ago
I've long wondered about something, but I haven't been able to figure it out. This may be my best chance. What is the difference between the following two compensation strategies: (1) You get 100 options, that vest at 1/4 af
395.
by areyousure 11y ago
I agree. I believe this site is excellent.
396.
by areyousure 11y ago
(This is not technically a reply to you, but just some context in case anyone else is interested.) For my own benefit, I have attempted to interpret the statistics in this relatively authoritative source: http://www.erneuerbare-e
397.
by areyousure 11y ago
Re your last sentence: hardly any Founding father was Catholic.
398.
by areyousure 11y ago
Though you are correct that interest rates are very low, I believe it is disingenuous to quote the rate of a gilt with a maturity under 10 years. (You have mentioned the 2-year gilt.)
399.
by areyousure 12y ago
Out of curiosity, what were the three words? (Presumably not "stochastic optimal control"..)
400.
by areyousure 12y ago
Fyi: that's not a typo. See the middle of page 2, where the author introduces "the FredEx problem". The caption for figure 1 on page 3 also references the same problem.
401.
by areyousure 12y ago
Unfortunately, your area for San Francisco is 80% water. The more relevant data of land area is more like 60 km^2 for Manhattan and 120 km^2 for San Francisco. Edit: as a result, your comparison to Pune is significantly inaccurate. Indeed,
402.
by areyousure 12y ago
At Princeton university, faculty members are not allowed to proctor in-class exams. (See the top of page 2 of https://registrar.princeton.edu/faculty-services/Conduct_of_... for a reference.) Do you feel similarly tha
403.
by areyousure 12y ago
Wait, why'd you stop? Isn't this a great way to filter out those 30--40% of people?
404.
by areyousure 12y ago
It is my understanding that Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) is a cash benefit. Do you not consider TANF in the U.S. to be "welfare" in the form of a cash grant?
405.
by areyousure 12y ago
Thank you for the explanation of how that came about. Cheers!
406.
by areyousure 12y ago
No, your parent comment has in fact literally quoted the amendment. For example, on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_S... you will find the full text as follows: "Congress shall make no
407.
by areyousure 12y ago
"For numbers which are multiples of both three and five print “FizzBuzz”."
408.
by areyousure 12y ago
So how does one write the (square x) macro in Common Lisp? Presumably, one would like to avoid evaluating the argument twice as well as accidental variable capture.
409.
by areyousure 12y ago
Thanks for your response! Good luck.
410.
by areyousure 12y ago
Out of curiosity, where does your script get data (prices and whatever else)?
411.
by areyousure 12y ago
Yes and no. You can still unintentionally call out to bash if you, say, protect your PATH: $ x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' perl -t -le'$ENV{PATH}="/bin";print `:;date`' vulnerable Sat Sep 27 10:5
412.
by areyousure 12y ago
I believe you, actually, but can you provide a source? Thanks.
413.
by areyousure 12y ago
In response to your edit: Zimmerman's defense did not invoke Florida's Stand Your Ground law.
414.
by areyousure 12y ago
I don't believe that is correct. A page that asks to be kept confidential from one year ago (S13) clearly indicates that founders are to decide the same evening that they receive a call back. Am I missing something?