aredox

17 ms·

241.
by aredox 1y ago
To add more points: - Who is in charge of trade negociations? - Who is in charge of Foreign Policy? - Who is in charge of epidemic response? (See https://www.axios.com/2025/06/05/cdc-director-leadership-vac...
242.
by aredox 1y ago
Read the article. CO2 is already installed as a fire suppression system. The problems are non-technological: system disconnected, doors left open, late activation... The shipping industry is exploiting people to crew barely-seaworthy ships,
243.
by aredox 1y ago
This article lists 10 boats in 2 years. Is it more than a rounding error for insurance companies? Yes, every one of these incidents is impressive because those are big boats, but there are thousands of them running around.
244.
by aredox 1y ago
When was that ever the scientific consensus? I was there in the 90s, thank you, I am old enough for that. The real affirmation is that "Coastal cities underwater" is a "risk" for roughly a dozen of them by "the end
245.
by aredox 1y ago
My God, not only this administration is dumb, but you are too, and, in true Dunning-Krueger fashion, you think everyone but you is. Yes, I have read almost all the executive orders: they are challenged by "so many lawsuits there aren&
246.
by aredox 1y ago
>gave me sort of a Climate Change vibe. You mean the thing that was right from the beginning, that is happening right now and that is even worse than the forecast?
247.
by aredox 1y ago
>implying the administration is dumb Sorry, but that administration is dumb , period. Stop being politically correct.
248.
by aredox 1y ago
Yeah, and not specifying them - as well as not specifying the assembly steps, which for some models isn't obvious; I know it, I build the bed frame on page 24 - is part of the learning process. "Autoprogettazione" is not a DI
249.
by aredox 1y ago
Can it be brutalist when you have the richness of wood in full diplay, veins, shimmer and knots all apparent? And nothing stops you to paint them or engrave them. Is a wooden box "brutalist" too? It is a box. It is square. Is the
250.
by aredox 1y ago
I think you should check your own knowledge before double-guessing Enzo Mari - a designer who did the work and had extensive knowledge of form and materials spanning decades. This is not an ""argument from authority" but &quo
251.
by aredox 1y ago
What is interesting also in Enzo Mari's concept is that there is no instructions, you have to figure out the best order of operations and how to offset some planks with others. For those of you who start from really zero and have no id
252.
by aredox 1y ago
I should have gone with "socialist" to avoid all you "ackchually" people who try to educate me on the evils of Soviet Communism while the discourse in the USA is that anything slightly to the left of Pinochet is "CO
253.
by aredox 1y ago
Crazy realistic. Scarily thruthy.
254.
by aredox 1y ago
Well, you wanted a "free enterprise" society, why do you complain now? Isn't that freedom? Of expression, of commerce, of association... ...Oh, you are worried about power asymmetry? What are you, a communist ?
255.
by aredox 1y ago
I would be vey interested with the same test with Ada - another langage used in high-reliability situations.
256.
by aredox 1y ago
>I can’t decode French elitism. It is a clear case of "langue-dans-la-joue" (or is it "langue-dans-la-fesse"?).
257.
by aredox 1y ago
I was going to say that. We really need a way to customise software at the source code level without forking.
258.
by aredox 1y ago
"I don't know" isn't stochastic. Are you even human?
259.
by aredox 1y ago
>I've found a lot of employers admire people who were willing to wipe old peoples' asses when the economy is bad rather than wale about the circumstances. That's what they'd say to your face, but statistics show that
260.
by aredox 1y ago
If you ask me the result of "2 + 2", I will always give you the same answer. No randomness there. LLM don't. And before you try: ChatGPT and others now simply calls plugins on math equations - running code written by humans.
261.
by aredox 1y ago
Quantum mechanics is weird but coherent and testable. Chemtrails or "COVID vaccines are killing, COVID isn't" aren't.
262.
by aredox 1y ago
Except that it does it by statistics. It does not understand , it gives the most likely answer. If Gemini had failed to give the answer or hallucinated anything else, the original author wouldn't have written a blog post: this is in e
263.
by aredox 1y ago
>So I'm not sure why people react like you do towards it. Is it different from seeing it in pictures? Yes: it is massive . There are few bigger experimental setups in the world. A telescope is "just a mirror", yet any mod
264.
by aredox 1y ago
There is an easy way to tell: who is internally coherent? Who is contradicting oneself?
265.
by aredox 1y ago
> it's OK to like the art and question the artist. And then the artist takes his fortune and his fame to get laws voted against you and your friends and family.
266.
by aredox 1y ago
Why can't we examine factually the thinking that pushes policy affecting millions of citizens by repeateadly claiming "Americans won't pay tarriffs"? And does it over and ove again, on DEI, immigrants, transexuals, their
267.
by aredox 1y ago
>[Trump] will shake things up for the better. Well, that was already the first sign of senility. Trump, at that point, was already a know quantity for decades: a crook and a con man.
268.
by aredox 1y ago
The cruelty is the point of Trumpism. But right back at you: you really don't think Communists or Fascists' political leaning doesn't alter their empathy?
269.
by aredox 1y ago
And Adams failed to keep with himself with his fawning over who could be described as the pointy-headed-boss in chief. Seriously, making your whole career deriding stupid, clueless, cruel top managers and then lionizing Trump... I guess t
270.
Axios'management Pushes AI Internally(axios.com)
1 points by aredox 1y ago|6 comments

More ›