Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aredox
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
481.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
The rules on doxing are applied haphazardly. Musk is fine with censorship with his Chinese CCP friends, anyway, so the hypocrisy is as big as his Melon.
482.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
"I am ready to pay 1000000 USD to anyone who tortures and/or kills you or anyone in your family in the most gruesome way." Isn't that free speech?
483.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Even with the partial overturn, it is perfectly clear there are limits to freedom of expression. The poster before you clearly mistakes "a high bar" to "no bar at all".
484.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
I does, like any other fundamental rights. Absolutely none are absolute. You clearly don't know anything about actual law and rights.
485.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Except that his email to buzzfeed clearly targeted Unsworth. Legal muddling by Musks lawers led Unsworth's to get the email out of the lawsuit, to save time and money, but that ended to be a bad legal strategy.
486.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
The "lane" is simple and has always been: no "right", as fundamental as it can be, is limitless. For ex. Freedom of movement is largely restricted, and the fact I can't "enter your house freely" is not a s
487.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Reminder that Musk once wrote an email to buzzfeed stating "“I suggest that you call people you know in Thailand, find out what’s actually going on and stop defending child rapists, you fucking asshole", about Vernon Unsworth, the
488.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
It gets downvoted because it tries to minimize or justify clear threats of using military force under exagerated pretense.
489.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
The EU is a web of political ties. An EU of only economic ties without any political commitment is what the UK wanted, and lok what happened.
490.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Why would US car manufacturers try to get their shit together with even less competition?
491.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
The problem is in the US, not in the EU. The US is in effect applying an "export" tax.
492.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
It completely wrong as it applies to local goods too.
493.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Even if it was true (spoiler: it's completely wrong), it still wouldn't be a tarrif.
494.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Yeah but these are tarriffs. Negotiate, if you want to get them away - but Trump has shown that his own word (the "beautiful" trade deal he signed during his first term) is worth absolutely nothing.
495.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
>The standard VAT in the UK is 20%! Yeah, and that pays for stuff like NHS. In the US you'd pay a medical insurance anyway. Compare comparable things.
496.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Economic ties don't stop wars. It was a theory of the 90's liberalism, and it was an illusion.
497.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
You just don't understand how VAT works, and you are not interested in understanding how VAT works, so... You're just wrong, and no amount of babysitting your bruised ego is going to change that.
498.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Even if it was true (spoiler: it's completely wrong), it still wouldn't be a tarrif.
499.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Even if it was true (spoiler: it's completely wrong), it still wouldn't be a tarrif.
500.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Even if it was true (spoiler: it's not true), it still wouldn't be a tarrif.
501.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Even if it was expensive, it still wouldn't be a tarrif.
502.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Wrong, wrong, wrong. When the good passes from one country to the next, the vat from the first country is given back - as if it was bought tax-free - and the VAT of the country you're in applies. Before the EU common market, you used t
503.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
I don't get why you believe the liars who told you an American car would pay more overall VAT than a domestically produced car. I mean, you are getting lied to your face, by someone who is a serial liar, so why are you trying to find a
504.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
It doesn't. It has never been. Trump is a liar and a crook and is bullshitting you.
505.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Yeah, yeah. Go to Somalia, Galt.
506.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
There is absolutely nothing, at any step, that takes into account where an item has been produced when the VAT is calculated. You don't need to know anything about VAT to understand at least this very tiny, simple and obvious fact. B
507.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
You say she's male, but she says she's female. How can you square that with "I am absolutely not accusing Khelif of pretending to be something she's not" when you are absolutely accusing her of doing that?
508.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
Are you dense? The VAT applies to all purchases and doesn't discriminate on where an item is produced. Have Americans become really that dumb?
509.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
You're in luck: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42918902
510.
▲
by
aredox
2y ago
This is a ridiculous post: >In fact every medal winner in the women's 800m at the 2016 Olympics was male. were "male" is redefined as "the 46,XY karyotype". What's next, are we going to screen all basketball
More ›