Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
archgoon
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
76 ms
·
691.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
If this reasoning is valid, we might as well accuse you and the grand parent of being internet kratom sellers, who have a vested interest in convincing HN readers of the benign nature of Kratom. In any case, your reasoning is completely inv
692.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
This is pretty typical for most open source projects. The major version will rarely get bumped unless the devs feel that it is a significant update (or they have some predefined meaning of bumping a major version, like breaking APIs). See f
693.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
It's not clear in this case that what they've built is mathematically analogous to GR wormholes. This seems more on the "it's kinda conceptually similar" rather than "this works exactly the same as a wormhole u
694.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
I was responding, perhaps my misinterpretation, to your assertion that it was unclear what the 'nightmare scenario' was. I asserted that if you had been following the recent developments of the LHC (or had some idea as to what the
695.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
> since we're not sure what the LHC Nightmare Scenario is. I disagree. I believe that the intended audience of this article, people familiar with what the LHC has been up to, what it's goals were, who are keeping up with curren
696.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
> The ideal situation that you've described is how the FBI actually works. FBI Agents in their off hours have engaging philosophical debates? I hadn't heard about this. Is this from personal experience, or is this a criticism o
697.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
And I'm sure that her primary motivation when writing the title was to get donation clicks.
698.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
This isn't clickbait. Do you see any ads on this page? This is an accurate characterization of the worst outcome (that doesn't involve space aliens) that scientists were worried about when the LHC launched.
699.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
This is actually extremely common. For example, if you browse the UC Irvine ML datasets https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/index.html You'll find that many are in csv format. If you do a search on data.gov http:/
700.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
So why didn't any of this conspiracy to rig Diebold machines get referenced in the 20,000 leaked emails?
701.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
Look forward to seeing the benchmarks. Good luck!
702.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
Javascript has very different semantics from rust. It's not compiled for one thing, it's untyped, and it's executed by a dynamic interpreter that, in the case of v8, directly compiles hot code to native assembly.
703.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
I most certainly did not say this wasn't huge. However, to extend your analogy, discovering neutrons doesn't overturn the existence of atoms, nor does it overturn the idea that atoms are made up of smaller components. Anyhow, that
704.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
The main revolution 150 years ago was that lichen was not a single organism. I'm not sure if refining that number from 2 to 3 is legitimately "overturning"; I was reading the article expecting them to say that the two organis
705.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
That strategy did not work well for Ernst Röhm. Given that the entirety of Trump's campaign seems to be one of political expediency, I don't see Thiel being anymore than "Trump's best friend is gay, so of course we'
706.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
How does the submitter propose the automated system should be tweaked? What is the problem that they have identified?
707.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
Thank you for clarifying the approach (and with not trying to use latex!) :). The issue is, of course, the illegitimate manipulation of a diverging series, which was the exact issue that prompted the original article (due to Numberphile doi
708.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
> which leads to all of this mysticism and confusion. Funny, I thought the entire point of this 'simplification' was not to be mystical and hand wavey.
709.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
That's completely unreadable. So how exactly is it that by multiplying a regular sum of positive numbers by a decaying exponent do you get a negative number when you take the limit?
710.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
Thank you, I shouldn't have reused the incorrect terminology here (it matters). Thanks for bringing this point up, I completely agree with you, because there is no chance of consumer confusion between these products, which is a reasona
711.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
Um... are you responding to a different thread? I believe that we're in agreement here. It's the original poster who thinks that once a corporate entity has laid claim to a word, other people should feel obligated to avoiding usin
712.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
I think it's pretty uncool to copyright a word which is a fundamental particle and prevent people from using it.
713.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
Very unfortunate that a corporate entity chose the name Gluon, as it's already the name that was assigned fifty years ago to a fundamental particle. At least, that's what I get when I do a simple google search. Also, this project
714.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
This is taught in american middle schools and high schools. Multiple times; it's the defacto example of how exponents work. It is not explicitly called out in the Common Core standard, but several of the examples in the common core are
715.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
You mentioned it as as an aside. The well ordering property is completely irrelevant.
716.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
The Gaussian integers are well ordered as well. That '<' respects arithmetic operations isn't an aside; it's the core feature.
717.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
Which means they could have put out twice the clean energy in ten years time if they didn't have to shut down the nuclear plant.
718.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
> there isn't time There's even less time when you're taking existing power capacity offline.
719.
▲
Control Challenges
(janismac.github.io)
2 points
by
archgoon
10y ago
|
0 comments
720.
▲
by
archgoon
10y ago
For those of you have heard about this back in December, there is no new data at the moment. The only update is that CERN is firing up again; hopefully we'll hear an update in the next several months or so.
More ›