Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
archgoon
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
You are aware that there are languages other than English, and that the author is Swiss? It may even blow your mind that Google searches are not in fact the same for other people, and can vary in time, location, and the individual searching
32.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
(B) Would exclude this article so I think it's a bad rule.
33.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
I think you meant type Human struct { Name string MaybeHasCat *Cat } As you have written (not making MaybeHasCat a pointer), go will correctly initialize (at least as of go1.20.5) the nested Cat structure and allow for di
34.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
I don't believe the word 'ego' appears anywhere in the article.
35.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
> Trigger Bounce Mostly makes me think of some EE effect you'd see with a o-scope. "Yeah, that's not real, it's just Trigger Bounce"
36.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
If you should peruse the paper that they published, be aware that the actual meat of the paper is in the supplementary section, past the citations. I was extremely disappointed the paper until I realized that.
37.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
> And teaching is not about getting people to say aha. Thats just performance or entertainment. Thank you. Reading the article will not in fact give you an easier time at the Jackson Problem sets. I think many people who think this would
38.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
The basic ideas, the pictures, the diagrams, etc, found here, typically show up in enough books if you look for them that I don't feel that this was the main limiting factor in my physics education. The difficulty of Jackson (which doe
39.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
Depends on what you mean. If you mean "how much is commercially viable" versus "how many kilograms of the stuff are there" you get very, very different answers. For just "how much stuff is there", we can look a
40.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
There's an interesting underlying philosophy of what constitutes a 'hack' and what constitutes a 'glitch' here. Both are clearly going against what was intended by the original developers, and if you push a 'gl
41.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
Not sure what to make of this. If the authorization is basically not being used, then it's a decent question to ask why they are so interested in renewing it. Unfortunately, I don't think there's a reasonable way to answer th
42.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
Even better, they implement negative exponents as well, so you don't have to find a library or cobble together an extended gcd function, since you get in inverses for free.
43.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
Since I can't currently order, can someone say how the ordering process works? Do they send back a link to be used with stripe? Or do they try to handle everything within the terminal? The latter seems to invalidate their claim that th
44.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
LoRa is radio communication so part of EE, not CS. Otherwise, I'm going to toss TV shows as part of CS, since Amazon Prime and Netflix streaming are things. Also, it's the original programming.
45.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
No, this is the opposite phenomenon. Chip frequencies didn't detach from the reality. However, as you point out, the performance improved regardless because frequency wasn't the only thing that could be improved. Another poster
46.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
'This person' sounds like cts being cts doing cts things. Don't see why you'd think they're copying Foone.
47.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
Chen has not claimed to have broken SVP; only in certain situations. This is a better LLL; not a polynomial hierarchy overturning.
48.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
This was last discussed 6 years ago. The pocket calculator can now finally accomplish all described tasks.
49.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
I don't think this is a reasonable interpretation of an unsent later. The point of creating documents for the purposes of CYA requires them to be publicly recorded otherwise there will be accusations that the document was created after
50.
▲
by
archgoon
2y ago
I believe that several citations of your assertions is in order.
51.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
> I believe I could walk up to any college senior in physics and they wouldn't know that “the determinant is the product of the eigenvalues," Unless things have gotten significantly worse in physics education in the past decade
52.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
I mean, it's pretty impressive that Quantum Mechanics forbids FTL communication without referencing the speed of light at all and relies entirely on linearity.
53.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
I'm kinda shocked that neither the Vision Pro or the Quest allow for actual AR development since the passthrough cameras aren't available to 3p devs.
54.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
What are you trying to simulate? Elodin is not really the same sort of physics simulator at all.
55.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
It's the nature of the word "can't" which allows a single counterexample to debunk an argument. If the grandparent poster really meant "It is quite difficult", then it seems that we have arrived at a more accur
56.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
I don't think you've grappled with the point the author is making. >“If we open up ChatGPT or a system like it and look inside, you just see millions of numbers flipping around a few hundred times a second,” says AI scientist S
57.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
Strong words. Why do you believe no one knows how magnets work? What would be a satisfactory answer?
58.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
David Brin wrote on this in "The Transparent Society". From the Amazon summary: > David Brin is worried, but not just about privacy. He fears that society will overreact to these technologies by restricting the flow of informat
59.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
> Precision Medicine, on the other hand, is an innovative approach that takes into account individual differences in people’s genes, environments, and lifestyles. That seems to be a far cry from asserting genetic determinism. Can you exp
60.
▲
by
archgoon
3y ago
Why?
More ›