arb99

20 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by arb99 16y ago

   then rather than just type one url in and get redirected, they have to remember to type in a url, then type in a word. its easier as it is.
2. 212.▲
   by arb99 16y ago

   I don't use stumbleupon, but first thing i thought when I saw your page is "wow thats a big stumble upon icon". And when i compared them, they are pretty similar, just rotated.
3. 213.▲
   by arb99 16y ago

   Ah, completely missed that point about the Reply All kind of function
4. 214.▲
   by arb99 16y ago

   IMO its pretty useless. Especially for iPhone users, like your example images - because i've texted my normal bunch of mates as a group before, the iphone keeps that message together with the group, and every week if i want to send them a t
5. 215.▲
   by arb99 16y ago

   I submitted a response option that was something like blah blah blah "blah blah" and it showed up on the panel as blah blah blah */[]*/blah blah" also, i can't work out how to preview it on my own site without trying it on
6. 216.▲
   by arb99 16y ago

   It is from early 2008 though, website looks have changed a lot in the past few years. (but i do think even for 2008 it was out dated)
7. 217.▲
   by arb99 16y ago

   Was never aware of that. Maybe stackoverflow could do with a redesign to make it more obvious ;)
8. 218.▲
   by arb99 16y ago

   I think he forgot that it was "designed by developers FOR developers". I've never had a problem with the way it looks. Some of his points are valid, but you can think of better ways to do things on 99% of sites. Including his - which is a b