apstls

8 ms·

31.
Emergefs: Serverless, object-oriented, computational file system for Python(github.com)
1 points by apstls 3y ago|0 comments
32.
by apstls 3y ago
Left.
33.
by apstls 3y ago
from a pinned message on their discord: https://s3.amazonaws.com/releases.lmstudio.ai/prerelease/LM+...
34.
by apstls 3y ago
The current models would presumably be accessible for customers regardless of OpenAI’s state. If OpenAI were to hypothetically somehow vanish into thin air, products and features built on their products could still be supported by Azure’s o
35.
by apstls 3y ago
The waiver still allows for logging of prompts for the specific purpose of abuse monitoring for some limited retention period, right? How difficult is it to have this waived as well?
36.
by apstls 3y ago
I don’t really understand what safety work is or entails here, given OpenAI will surely not be the only group to achieve AGI (assuming any group does.) What stops other companies from offering similar models with no (or just less) regard fo
37.
by apstls 3y ago
I am also not a stranger to board positions. However, I have never been on the board of a non-profit that is developing technology with genuinely deep, and as-of-now unknown, implications for the status quo of the global economy and - at le
38.
by apstls 3y ago
The board, like any, is a small group of people, and in this case a small group of people divided into two sides defined by conflicting ideological perspectives. In this case, I imagine the board members have much broader and longer-term pe
39.
by apstls 3y ago
I've been wondering if there's a chance the inevitable explosion of hyper-realistic disinformation and manipulation content - of course brought on by genai significantly reducing the cost and barrier to entry to very high-volume r
40.
by apstls 3y ago
LlamaPatch? Once open source model support is added of course :)
41.
by apstls 3y ago
If you assume the LLM can gauge its “confidence” in the last n tokens it generated, which seems within the realm of reason (from a layman’s perspective), then I would think this idea would work better the significant majority of the time. I
42.
by apstls 3y ago
Are there any good resources related to expanding context windows, or even just the mechanics of how they actually work as properties of a model?
43.
by apstls 3y ago
Ah, gotcha! Do you have a rough idea of when the DSPy paper will be released? I'll keep an eye out.
44.
by apstls 3y ago
I'm trying to wrap my head around this project too, since it does seem interesting. Similar to what OP wrote, the sense I got from poking around (and of course from reading the bit in the README that basically says exactly this) was th
45.
by apstls 3y ago
This was clearly a large-scale coordinated effort spanning multiple countries, multiple organizations within the US including DOJ lawyers, named and unnamed industry partners, etc. This is not a context in which a single group could do unet
46.
by apstls 3y ago
This was the case here as well.
47.
by apstls 3y ago
How many homes could $17B make?
48.
by apstls 4y ago
Same. I got into the workflow of copy/pasting long notes into TextEdit so I could ctrl-F normally. It began to feel so outrageous that I was paying for a text editor and had to resort to a workflow involving a second text editor for a
49.
by apstls 4y ago
And failed to deliver
50.
by apstls 4y ago
This is effectively a strawman argument. My comment, and the one I was responding to, are discussing Russian meddling (as in election interference efforts) while you are discussing Trump-Russia collusion , a (very, very) small subset of
51.
by apstls 4y ago
One minute of googling found these: - https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download - https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/docu... - https://www.dni.go
52.
by apstls 4y ago
> but the focus of the Twitter files in this regard is clearly specific to the false Russia Trump connection propagated by Dem polticians and leftists. Which makes the comment I was replying to (which is the comment one level a
53.
by apstls 4y ago
I apologize if my comment appeared to be disingenuous. I would like to understand why you believe that Russian election meddling did not occur and how this belief formed based on the information contained in the Twitter files, which I have
54.
by apstls 4y ago
Is this sarcasm, or is there a subset of people here who truly believe that the Twitter “files” prove the significant investigative effort, offensive actions by US Cyber Command against the IRA, direct acknowledgement of the activities by Y
55.
by apstls 4y ago
The detail that it patches a critical vulnerability should be enough for you to assume you should care, assuming you care about security.
56.
by apstls 4y ago
I have not read this book; based on the author’s definitions, what additional conditions are required for accurate reporting by media outlets of foreign cyber attacks against our nation to be considered propaganda?
57.
by apstls 4y ago
Most people would point out that “misleading” is the operative word here.
58.
by apstls 4y ago
I admit I honed in on a detail in your comment that is mostly unrelated to your actual argument - an argument I fullheartedly agree with would not typically want to distract or detract from. However, after spending probably an order of magn
59.
by apstls 4y ago
Accurate reporting of Russia's cyber activities is not propaganda.
60.
by apstls 5y ago
These arrests would absolutely not have happened without US pressure.

More ›