apetrov

5 ms·

31.
by apetrov 1y ago
note: with duckdb you get network storage for free (ie delta table on s3 works the same as local) and i guess a smaller deps than pyarrow (might be wrong)
32.
by apetrov 1y ago
not sure why it should be specific to parquet file. a thin UI wrapper around duckdb could do the trick but for majority of formats (pq, csv, json, sqlite, iceberg, deltalake)
33.
by apetrov 2y ago
you don't have to do it in one go, i usually do pen and paper, 45m-1h of video time (~2h wall time) and often redo the same exercise a couple of months later
34.
by apetrov 2y ago
Unfortunately, there is only a ‘treatment’ group but no control group (aka non-repeatable treatment), so it's hard to draw conclusions from it. Also, the Poland location could be another explanation: if your neighbor is Russia, with wh
35.
by apetrov 2y ago
could not disagree with that
36.
by apetrov 2y ago
This is what chatgpt suggested to make it minimal viable agency (align with aforementioned acts): Staff: 10-50 employees, mostly in HQ Budget: ~$1-2M for core staff & admin, rest funneled through grants Field Presence: 1-3 priority coun
37.
by apetrov 2y ago
You’re not free to burn as much fuel as you want, as there are economic and physical limits in place. What you are free to do is choose how to allocate resources—heat up or cool down your apartment, train/run a neural network, watch a
38.
by apetrov 2y ago
Well, there is an economic incentive - "salary". If you're not interested in it, may be it's time to move on as time is your own most valuable asset and choosing to waste it on "free ride" - it's something
39.
by apetrov 2y ago
Sure, you can do. You can question wtf policy-makers are doing. instead, you question individuals decision (aka "how dare you") that are well within current laws.
40.
by apetrov 2y ago
You're mixing two things together: * something that's illegal (dumping used oil into a river) * and something that's perfectly legal (buying oil) You buy electricity and it's yours to decide how to use it. i.e. heat up y
41.
The Phenomenon of No-Performers(world.hey.com)
1 points by apetrov 2y ago|2 comments
42.
by apetrov 2y ago
https://youtu.be/vydgkCCXbTA?si=bIOBVn1wAsgPVLLr yeap long covid
43.
by apetrov 2y ago
Sorry, mate, but it sounds like one. Such lectures are better to conduct somewhere in ultra-luxury resorts, (flying in private jet of course), to decide what "plebs" are allowed to. Just a couple examples of hypocrisy. 1. COP28 in
44.
by apetrov 2y ago
Yes, especially when effect is marginal like in this case.
45.
by apetrov 2y ago
Unfortunately, some people just love to count their neighbor’s expenses instead of minding their own business.
46.
by apetrov 2y ago
i would, especially if there is mobile ui on horizon (hotwire) + added ports and adapters (aka hexagonal architecture, there are many articles on how to do it in ror) disclaimer: i work with ror since 2006 so i have a strong bias.
47.
by apetrov 2y ago
still you have to maintain the pile of boilerplate code and whoever does it, has a very narrow context window (aka human)
48.
by apetrov 2y ago
i stated untruthworness of this particular one and the response is "what about Israel". regarding gaza - it's a war in high density area fighting terrorist in civilian clothes. mind to remind who started the war? based on ca
49.
by apetrov 2y ago
this is not a trustworthy organization with a long track record https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amnesty_International https://nypost.com/2024/11/30/world-news/amnesty-internation...
50.
by apetrov 2y ago
call to dispose other's people money is easy. you are free to make you donation.
51.
by apetrov 2y ago
well, the list a little bit longer https://www.state.gov/foreign-terrorist-organizations/
52.
by apetrov 2y ago
Yes, it was the technique but many years ago, like 2015.
53.
by apetrov 2y ago
It depends on the complexity of the project. I assumed something nontrivial, like this project. I outlined some thoughts on the effects of consistent development and what the project might become in a comment above (current state vs. becomi
54.
by apetrov 2y ago
I don’t mean to discount any other work. I have already disclaimed that I don’t work in academia and rely on second-hand feedback from my classmates (in Europe)—for example, the Fortran implementation of Yoshida’s method from N years ago th
55.
by apetrov 2y ago
Yes, I can imagine multiple reasons why an author might decide to change their pace for whatever reason. my observation was that it changed. Based on my experience (both personal and from colleagues), when a project is not in active develop
56.
by apetrov 2y ago
Yes, I don’t question the usefulness of the project by any means. To be frank, I’m personally very interested in it—I studied celestial mechanics at university many years ago and am still curious about simulations. The graph on the chart I
57.
by apetrov 2y ago
update: based on author's activity on youtube, he still works on it https://www.youtube.com/@pavelsevecek/videos?view=0&sort=dd&...
58.
by apetrov 2y ago
Looks great, but GitHub metrics indicate that, unfortunately, the project has stalled. The last commit was six months ago on master and two months ago on develop. source: https://github.com/pavelsevecek/OpenSPH/gra
59.
by apetrov 2y ago
It’s been very tightly intertwined with the position. When you retire, your wealth is gone, and sometimes retirement equals a purge. I wouldn’t call this being among the wealthy elite by any means. Today, you live in the center of Moscow, a
60.
by apetrov 3y ago
This link would be better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4WAdtlSsK8&t=25890s (starting of his part)

More ›