anytime5704

8 ms·

31.
by anytime5704 3y ago
Via a boolean parameter, no less.
32.
by anytime5704 3y ago
Is it really that far fetched? It sounds like a self-imposed regulatory group, which some companies/industries operate proactively to avoid the ire of government agencies. Yeah, product teams can/should care about being responsibl
33.
by anytime5704 3y ago
GCP is a gigantic organization and I was a cog in a machine. I was aware that people criticized GCP for various reasons, but there wasn’t much I could do beyond my team/product area.
34.
by anytime5704 3y ago
It’s disheartening to read all the comments agreeing with this post. I actually worked on GCP for several years and we always made sure our customer facing API changes were backwards compatible. The decision to deprecate or “sunset” a featu
35.
by anytime5704 3y ago
Pretty sure it’s illegal according to both FTC and EU guidelines (the not disclosing what is/isn’t an ad). Can’t imagine this lasts.
36.
by anytime5704 3y ago
Isn’t this one of the reasons why privacy agreements/terms of use often don’t hold up in court when tested? Fwiw, I agree it’s scummy and the average person is likely to rollover because they think they already agreed to ____.
37.
by anytime5704 3y ago
> The creation of artificial deadlines leading to overtime, burnout, and, eventually, high staff turnover. > Inability to handle reality. Interruptions and unforeseen tasks will occur. The database may malfunction, revealing an archit
38.
by anytime5704 3y ago
Your memory must be better than mine. Having a couple notes about the things that stood out to me at the time is a great way to remind myself how I felt about books I’ve long since stopped thinking about.
39.
by anytime5704 3y ago
Also, url query parameters are kind of orthogonal to REST vs. GQL. They can complement either API. From personal experience, choosing not to use them (as most single page web apps don’t) can make testing painful and makes deep-linking to sp