antris

7 ms·

31.
by antris 4y ago
The most straightforward solution I can think of is to split date inputs by context. Create an `<input type="dob">` that is tailored for picking a date of birth from 1900-today. "date" is too vague of a context to
32.
by antris 4y ago
I've done several projects rebase-only with limited resources and time constraints. In fact, it saved resources and time when we did it. You have been repaid the time investment spent learning rebase commands, after once being able to
33.
by antris 4y ago
Yes you are correct that not saying "just" isn't enough. But saying it often works towards eroding that environment and it's unproductive towards that. That's the point of the post, not that it's a magic bullet
34.
by antris 4y ago
> how china companies r just direct extension of CCP where party members have would directly inject themselves into the companies, go read some materials first. There no private companies in the US/EU sense in China That's not
35.
by antris 4y ago
You said US companies have a leash, even though US is the prime example of corporate control of government. Companies are the same all over the world, their job is to maximize their value to investors by any means necessary. That's as
36.
by antris 4y ago
> American companies has a leash And what leash is that? The US government is the prime example of what happens when corporate money enters politics. There are only two parties and both of them serve the interests of capital. The US does
37.
by antris 4y ago
Our economic system has no built in incentives to stop these leaks. Considering how massive these leaks are, the budget to plug them shouldn't be a consideration. We're ruining our planet's livability with leaks like this, bu
38.
by antris 4y ago
Yes, I'm talking about after the fact analysis of whether optimism wasted time or not. I didn't say that optimism or pessimism is hindsight. So I'm not sure how your comment relates to anything I said, except you taking three
39.
by antris 4y ago
Or you could interpret it charitably, where the person states that when looking at actions after the fact, it can be said that being optimist about an action that turned out to not work caused you to waste time.
40.
by antris 4y ago
> Am I just missing out on something? Complex GTD systems are useful in unorganized workplaces where things are left to individuals to solve.. It's a way of juggling constantly changing priorities. So if you don't need them, it
41.
by antris 4y ago
Source control is an inherently distributed system. Each developer has their own copy of the code that are distributed across many computers, and they need to communicate between each other. That's exactly what the primary function o
42.
by antris 4y ago
Nothing's stopping you to use IRC this way, and it's trivial to add a bot to your channel with a poll feature. The problem isn't that nobody has designed or created such a system: it's that they're not very popular.
43.
by antris 4y ago
There's lots of people pointing out that the developer in this case wasn't perfect. But the underlying problem here is an organization that's supposed to give autonomy to developers, with a manager that is actively working ag
44.
by antris 4y ago
I was talking about Sámi history as a whole. Sámi parliament in Finland was recognized in 1995, and its authority is extremely limited. Basically they have no power over the Finnish government. Like I said, they have been thrown a bone and
45.
by antris 4y ago
Nothing about your comment disputes anything I said. I don't know why you posted this in such a contentious tone and implied that I'm squeezing "Sámi into a generic indigenous people mold". I wasn't stereotyping Sám
46.
by antris 4y ago
Sámi languages are split into many languages and dialects. Vast majority of the speakers are speaking Northern Sámi. But some have only a couple dozen speakers, and others are already extinct: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki&#
47.
by antris 4y ago
Strictly speaking it's not the hosts knowledge that changes the problem, but the fact that as a contestant you know how the host operates. This makes you able to extract information about the choice the host makes. Different ways of ho
48.
by antris 4y ago
Nope. That version is listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem#Other_host_... "Monty Fall" or "Ignorant Monty": The host does not know what lies behind the doors, and opens one
49.
by antris 4y ago
Switching doesn't change where the prize is more likely to be. That's not how the Monty Hall Problem works. It's the host giving you information about what's happening behind the scenes, by choosing a door to open and yo
50.
by antris 4y ago
From the article: The original problem: > The host acts as noted in the specific version of the problem. > Switching wins the car two-thirds of the time. The random door pick: > "Monty Fall" or "Ignorant Monty&quot
51.
by antris 4y ago
You're the one who's saying the odds change when the door is opened. I'm the one saying that the odds remain the same (or rather, increase to 50/50) if the doors picked are random. If the host knows where the prize is, t
52.
by antris 4y ago
If the door the host chooses is random, and the door you choose first is random, then it's 50/50, because there's only two doors left and neither door choice was made with any information of what's behind the door. Your
53.
by antris 4y ago
>The problem statement doesn't permit him to choose the prize Doesn't disallow it either. That's the problem: if you describe the problem without all necessary details, it doesn't work like the Monty Hall Problem is s
54.
by antris 4y ago
That the host opens a door without prize.
55.
by antris 4y ago
The part about never having a prize behind it was not explained to me. It was just "you pick a door, host opens a door without prize". That doesn't imply that there's never a prize behind the door that the host opens.
56.
by antris 4y ago
The fact that the show host knows what's behind the doors and never chooses a door with the prize behind it is crucial. The host leaks information about what's behind, as he chooses a door. I was told about this problem and the pe
57.
by antris 4y ago
Yet companies turn a blind eye towards people who abuse alcohol, even throwing parties where people are encouraged to drink alcohol. If your chosen substance is alcohol, you can even be an alcoholic and still keep your job if it doesn'
58.
by antris 4y ago
>How would I even know they are clean? This question applies to all employees. You don't, because it's none of your business if it doesn't affect their work performance. It is entirely possible, and probably likely that so
59.
by antris 4y ago
When it comes to US, adding more candidates doesn't change the politics. Genuine grassroots campaigns have an almost impossible climb against establishment endorsed candidates in both major parties, and creating your own party does not
60.
by antris 4y ago
>why are so few people interested in becoming politicians? Uh... what? There's a shortage of politicians nowhere, lol.

More ›