antris

103 ms·

451.
by antris 10y ago
Judges are not elected in my country, so can't comment on that.
452.
by antris 10y ago
Proper training alleviates these fallacies. I trust a judge much better than a jury of random people.
453.
by antris 11y ago
No need to use or understand a compiler. Also plain JS has better existing tooling (IDE plugins etc.) than JSX.
454.
by antris 11y ago
You've hit the nail on the head. I've never seen a fair JSX vs. React.createElement comparison on a blog post. The latter is never given even a basic refactoring such as you and your child comment suggested.
455.
by antris 11y ago
It's not misleading at all. I've created several React apps without JSX. I just didn't feel I had a need for it, and React without JSX worked really well. People make these exaggerated comparisons of raw React code vs. JSX wh
456.
by antris 11y ago
> If someone starting with React sees all that React.create element, they will run away. That's a possible reaction. Other developers would refactor instead of running away, though. Not using JSX doesn't mean typing React.creat
457.
by antris 11y ago
Even in countries that have maximum prison sentence length, people who are considered dangerous are still not let out into the public. They'll stay until they are considered rehabilitated. For dangerous people that have mental health p
458.
by antris 11y ago
Of course it's not forbidden. It's just confusing to say you're comparing React to a framework, when you implicitly include things other than React in the definition of React.
459.
by antris 11y ago
But then you're comparing "React + 2-3 items" vs. framework, not React vs. framework
460.
by antris 11y ago
> Second, when we say React we almost ALWAYS mean React + Router + some Flux lib, etc. -- so all the same things you get with Angular, just cherry picked. This premise is quite silly. Not every programmer is looking to create or adopt a
461.
by antris 11y ago
Anyone have a link to the article without the paywall?
462.
Writeup on Reaktor Hunt Challenge(github.com)
2 points by antris 11y ago|0 comments
463.
by antris 11y ago
I'm a front-end developer and you are absolutely right.
464.
by antris 11y ago
> That's the difference in your man vs. woman scenario - someone working in a coal mine may not feel like they have much choice but as you say they are agreeing to the work. Of course this is not to say that some men aren't li
465.
by antris 11y ago
DDG is based in the US, therefore it is entirely possible that they have been ordered to keep logs and track everything the users do on that site with a gag order. Being based in the US is a dealbreaker for privacy.
466.
by antris 11y ago
It's a really neat article. Thanks for explaining this stuff. I have no patience for it :)
467.
by antris 11y ago
> But there's something to be said for having a single template file for a single page in Angular, versus having JSX scattered among 20+ components for that same single page in React I'm not sure what you mean. There's n
468.
Code == UX(reaktor.com)
14 points by antris 11y ago|0 comments
469.
by antris 12y ago
I've deployed two applications to production that use React and in neither has React created a performance bottleneck. Both of them are heavily used in mobile, too. And they work wonderfully. Benchmarks don't mean much when you&#x
470.
by antris 12y ago
React is not a framework though.
471.
by antris 12y ago
Anyone have a link without the paywall?
472.
by antris 12y ago
> Obviously it'll be a bad idea to have everyone working on my project create their own patterns and will make sense to mandate everyone follow one set of patterns so we don't have to keep context-switching whenever we're
473.
by antris 12y ago
Can you name an app that is not "a glorified database"? Seems to apply for almost anything. Hacker News, Facebook, Twitter and so on... It's all about putting in and getting data from a database
474.
by antris 12y ago
Of course they want it as fast as possible. But they also want the code to not slow the team down later on. And they want a cure for cancer, eternal happiness and world peace too. My point is that people say and want all kinds of things, bu
475.
by antris 12y ago
> The perils of Agile. You are only allowed to do what you stakeholders understand. The rest is ignored. Sounds like quite a passive aggressive way to solve a communication problem. "You only said we needed feature X, you didn'
476.
by antris 12y ago
Doesn't sound like agile development to me. In Agile development you usually refactor as you go. Refactoring is not a separate task, it's part of the process. http://www.extremeprogramming.org/rules/refactor.h
477.
by antris 12y ago
There's a lot of cheap crap on the market but there's also some great designs out there. For example, I've got this light control system installed in my home: http://houm.io/ Wireless, battery-free buttons th
478.
Pie vs. bar charts(twitter.com)
2 points by antris 12y ago|0 comments
479.
by antris 12y ago
The same exact problem exists inherently in CSS itself and has been addressed in many ways through different kinds of conventions. One way is to mix two different sets of styles for the element. Set 1 gives the element the general styles of
480.
Daddy, what does the “new” keyword do?(nullzzz.blogspot.com)
2 points by antris 12y ago|0 comments

More ›