antisyzygy

10 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by antisyzygy 5y ago

   Republican leaders have shown their hypocrisy for decades at this point. Say one thing, do another, perpetually. This is more evidence of the same. It's most certainly a "they" thing.
2. 32.▲
   by antisyzygy 6y ago

   Par for the course. I would expect their PR teams to do this. They do it for CEOs and other executives too. If you can/need to pay for a PR team it will happen.
3. 33.▲
   by antisyzygy 6y ago

   Please. It's the only option available to a lot of people anymore especially with COVID shutdowns but it's part of a larger shift to a knowledge-economy. There aren't many jobs for unskilled workers anymore and getting skills
4. 34.▲
   by antisyzygy 6y ago

   Right. Even if you assume the worst-case-scenario there isn't some standard risk metric nor threshold to meet. I feel like differential privacy is the strongest definition we have, but it is also lacking from a practical standpoint. Wh
5. 35.▲
   by antisyzygy 6y ago

   Risk of re-identification is hard to estimate. It's mostly because you have to assume some state of background knowledge. I.e. what fields does the adversary even know something about. If Im looking for a white male in new york city it
6. 36.▲
   by antisyzygy 6y ago

   I could see that for a field like biology. In some other disciplines older texts weather better.