antidesitter

55 ms·

511.
by antidesitter 8y ago
Can you indicate which comment you're referring to?
512.
by antidesitter 8y ago
Can you be more specific? Are you referring to cash?
513.
by antidesitter 8y ago
cryptocurrency is clearly the wrong solution to this problem Why is it the "wrong" solution to making a decentralized marketplace? What's the "right" solution?
514.
by antidesitter 8y ago
they're more interested in riding the crypto hype wave than in solving real problems On what basis do you make that accusation? And how does supporting cryptocurrency preclude them from solving "real problems", whatever tha
515.
by antidesitter 8y ago
Do you know why OpenBazaar chose to support cryptocurrency?
516.
by antidesitter 8y ago
Why does it remove all of the platform’s credibility in your eyes?
517.
by antidesitter 8y ago
Sarbox was enacted in 2002.
518.
by antidesitter 8y ago
Did you empirically check your hypothesis? What's the integral of r^2 dr? Think about whether your claim makes sense when n = 1.
519.
by antidesitter 8y ago
I disagree that this theorem is very deep. See https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2046777/deep-theore... .
520.
by antidesitter 8y ago
Well, obviously, the shortest program that outputs "0" is "0". And the shortest program that outputs "1" is "1". We're only interested in the general case, not specific cases. Just wanted to no
521.
by antidesitter 8y ago
Bennett’s logical depth.
522.
by antidesitter 8y ago
I agree. Cardinal numbers (and bijections) are probably easier to start with.
523.
by antidesitter 8y ago
A different bright kid might ask about ω−1, which opens a different but fruitful line of discussion: ω is not a successor ordinal, it is a limit ordinal. ω - 1 makes sense in the surreal numbers ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w