anta40

10 ms·

121.
by anta40 2y ago
Even when using frameworks, typically Go devs, from what I see, prefer something simpler, like Fiber or Echo. Then they plug any libraries the like on top of it.
122.
by anta40 2y ago
What would you use if ORM is to be avoided? Perhaps something like https://github.com/sqlc-dev/sqlc ?
123.
by anta40 2y ago
Ahh very cool. Guess I can say goodbye to Power Point/Keynote/etc.
124.
by anta40 2y ago
Ah why do I forget about that? Thanks for the reminder. I also found movitz: - https://github.com/dym/movitz - https://github.com/karlosz/movitz - https://github.com/PuercoPop&#x2F
125.
by anta40 2y ago
Is system (OS kernel, microcontroller, etc) etc these days in Lisp is still a thing? My impression is if you want a minimalist lang to do that, that would be Forth. Would love to see Lisp is used for anything low level. I've read about
126.
by anta40 2y ago
>> "They created the language after getting tired of the endless dependency chain massive language stacks that are required to make ios apps, electron/web apps" As a mobile app dev, I definitely understand this pain: -F
127.
by anta40 2y ago
I think Go is fine for application development (any stuffs that runs on top of OS). But for system programming, which is generally understood as developing OS kernel (filesystem, memory management, device driver etc) or embedded which you b
128.
by anta40 2y ago
Slackware 11 was all I had in PC as univ student circa 2006-2008 (yep, just said goodbye to Win XP). All the tools I need to do assignments were provided in 3 CDs. At that time, fast internet connection was considered a bit expensive. Now I
129.
by anta40 2y ago
I'll wait for Ladybird to be more mature. Until then, I'm more than happy with Thorium: https://thorium.rocks/ So far, the only complain is it doesn't support Netflix (usual DRM stuff): https://git
130.
by anta40 2y ago
Pascal. Sure these days not many folks write OS kernel in Pascal, but there are some, e.g: https://github.com/torokernel/torokernel I once want to try Forth (perhaps there's a Unix clone in Forth?), but seems like
131.
Introduction to RISC assembly language programming's codes?
1 points by anta40 2y ago|1 comments
132.
by anta40 2y ago
I'll keep my eyes on this. Considering now most browsers are either Chromium (including Opera and Edge) or Firefox-based, a new alternative built from scratch will be interesting.
133.
by anta40 2y ago
At lease there's a difference: Core War uses fictional CPU architecture, while this one uses Z80. BTW, the first GameBoy is also a Z80 device, yes? Something to have fun with on weekend :)
134.
by anta40 2y ago
Ah looks interesting. Perhaps this is inspired by Core War? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_War
135.
by anta40 2y ago
I do it purely for fun: learning NES/Sega/GBA coding, hopefully being able to write simple games one day. When lockdown started in 2020, I thought working from home would give me more spare time, thus enrolled those classes on Ude
136.
by anta40 2y ago
>> Of course, Java still has its strengths, and for certain projects, it remains a solid choice. But for cloud-native applications, Kubernetes tooling, and our self-hostable software distribution platform, Go just feels like the right
137.
by anta40 2y ago
Perhaps try John Waldron's "Introduction to RISC Assembly Language Programming". I learnt from that many years ago during undergrad days. The simulator works on Windows/Linux/macOS. A bit simpler than X86 assembly.
138.
by anta40 2y ago
Imagine if "we" are OS/embedded dev folks. I mean, for writing userland apps, various langs come and go. But for writing OS, after more than 4 decades, C is still there. :D
139.
by anta40 2y ago
May I know who did the mirror resilvering? It's very common to see those old rangefinders' patch fade away.
140.
by anta40 2y ago
I think I still have a camera from the 30s: the 6x9 Ikonta. Compact, easily fits inside your pocket/small camera bag, and shoots pretty big negative. And oh, with a coupled rangefinder. One fun camera :D
141.
by anta40 2y ago
Understandable... but this is not that the point of the article. The article says "...a good first assembly language". Nowadays, normally people learn assembly after they learn higher level lang like C or Java.
142.
by anta40 2y ago
I use both nvim and vim on macOS using the same plugins config (vimscript) No luascript. No idea what are the disadvantages of this approach, but then again my usecases are pretty standard, e.g syntax highlighter, linter, auto-completion.
143.
by anta40 2y ago
I think various Lisp implementations have their own way to do it, e.g save-lisp-and-die on SBCL. But, if what you mean "executable" is "small compact executable like the one build by C/C++/Pascal, without extra Lisp
144.
by anta40 2y ago
Failed on 1st attempt, then beat it on 2nd attempt (I'm on Macbook Air). Very amusing idea. Perhaps I'll implement this for my personal project... well because why not? :p
145.
by anta40 2y ago
How to build this? I'm on M2 Mac with 2 Zigs installed: 0.13.0 and 0.14.0-dev.2589+0df1f3df2 Both gave the same error: run gbaimg (tiles.zig) transitive failure │ │ └─ zig build-exe gbaimg Debug native 1 errors
146.
by anta40 2y ago
No doubt it's more feature complete than xv6. Probably will try it on weekend.
147.
by anta40 2y ago
I still stick with xv6: https://github.com/mit-pdos/xv6-public - It's not only a kernel, but also have user space - Code is pretty compact and well documented, in general can be understood in a few days - No need
148.
by anta40 2y ago
Ah thank you. No wonder `cmake --preset Release` failed...
149.
by anta40 2y ago
Very easy. Find a bug in your software? Just push a fix. Problem solved. Found a bug in your hardware? OK this is trickier...
150.
by anta40 2y ago
Nice to see some folks encouraging how to solve problems with less fancy features/lang extentions (especially in commercial context), considering not all Haskell coders are programming language/compiler nerds :)

More ›