anonzzzies

590 ms·

3271.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
What’s passing in this case? It already passed and passed for a long time. You want it to pass for a 160 iq professor I guess, but the test doesn’t specify that. If player A is the local writer here who is very smart but annoying and player
3272.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
> or are trash engineers. So 99% of software ‘engineers’ then? Have you ever looked on Twitter what ‘professionals’ write and talk about? And what they produce (while being well paid)? People here generally seem to believe, after having
3273.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
You can loop chatgpt around automatically, asking it to write tests and reason about the code for a few iterations; in my experience it auto corrects the code like a human would after some ‘thinking’ time. Of course the code has to run aut
3274.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
Ah the HN echo chamber again! Please visit your local non FAAAM (or what it is now?) fortune 1000, pick a senior dev randomly and work with them for week. Chatgpt is vastly better now , today. Faster, does not need sleep, rest, politeness
3275.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
HN actually is generally quite negative on AI/ML and are the first to point out that humans are vastly better than this so we have no worries. This is indeed generally true for people on HN . However, it seems like many here never tal
3276.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
I was fired a few months ago from a well paying swe job; they said my performance was lacking because I was only doing my job and not more. Because the company is actually on my linkedin (they insisted on that to have my name there), my po
3277.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
You can do KYC with a KYC specialized company and agree on some way of not having the social media company getting hold of that info, just ‘user4639284757483858 is a real human and they are not already on your platform’.
3278.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
No, that’s kind of my point. It doesn’t matter for most people, so there will be some (futile) resistance and that is it. The problem is when AIs become such high quality that they can influence people’s minds and behaviours through psychol
3279.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
Outside the people on HN etc, aren’t people objectively worse off payment wise than in the 80s? Cannot buy houses and having to live with their parents? Sure we live longer and healthier (well, this is also mostly the well off people) and w
3280.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
> Maybe if all you ever exchanged with someone was a few sentences about inconsequential stuff. Like usually on HN, you give humans too much credit. Most people never exchange anything else with anyone but inconsequential stuff. IRL and
3281.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
I usually can find what I look for, but it doesn't download because there are no seeders. For awful hollywood sequel movies there are 1000s of seeders, but when you look for something that isn't or wasn't a blockbuster (or po
3282.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
We need a z-lib for movies, shows and music. Revive bittorrent (yes, i know it still exists but it simply doesn't have much content; not many people sharing/seeding anything but blockbusters) or, make a better bittorrent.
3283.
by anonzzzies 4y ago
When this happen, I do just download the movie (or book or music) illegally. I bought it, I own it, and companies trying to not let me have it despite that should expect this.
3284.
by anonzzzies 5y ago
I work in banking and when probing (internal) api’s of partners/clients you accidentally find stuff; they are all very broken and it is normal to find bugs and holes while just probing the use of the api; not trying to find issues. Not