anonymars

5 ms·

61.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Is this the one? https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20080619-00/?p=21...
62.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Related implication: the slow floppy formatting ( https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20090102-00/?p=19... )
63.
by anonymars 2mo ago
> Americans very consistently show the most emissions per Capita. Even beyond that, it is simply a false statement. Among the most, yes but consistently "the most", no https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/
64.
by anonymars 2mo ago
From Network (1976): You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West. There is only one holi
65.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Plus vaccines now
66.
by anonymars 2mo ago
"The system continues to function because it contains so many redundancies and because people can make it function, despite the presence of many flaws. After accident reviews nearly always note that the system has a history of prior ‘p
67.
by anonymars 2mo ago
I'm guessing it's more about "abolish the Senate" https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/07/senate-representat... Incidentally, if I wanted to sabotage a movement, I'd probably try to
68.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Iran looks to have figured it out too
69.
by anonymars 2mo ago
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/86
70.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Remember, if your vote didn't matter there wouldn't be so much effort to restrict it!
71.
by anonymars 2mo ago
You're not wrong - https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20051107-20/?p=33...
72.
by anonymars 2mo ago
"Alcohol causes hangovers" is a true statement. "Alcohol does not always cause hangovers" is also true. "Some people don't get hangovers from alcohol" is also true. "Some hangovers are not caused by a
73.
by anonymars 2mo ago
There are truths in there, but you seem to be looking only for evidence that supports your beliefs (and misreading evidence against your beliefs) instead of tailoring your beliefs based on evidence. Additionally you make blanket, definit
74.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Question for you: what is the goal of these comments? What is it would you like people to do or think differently after reading what you've written? I'll go first: my hope is that someone who has read what I've written will
75.
by anonymars 2mo ago
I wandered into a stupid thread that said "single-payer healthcare." The article/study that spawned this thread is about single-payer healthcare Public option is not single-payer/universal healthcare. Medicare for All i
76.
by anonymars 2mo ago
That being said: the whole thing is a complicated clusterfuck. Someone's health care spending is someone else's income. If one just snaps their fingers and enacts whatever ideal healthcare plan, what happens to those now-redunda
77.
by anonymars 2mo ago
I do believe it's mostly partisan. I don't believe it's exclusively partisan nor the most partisan In the 2020 debate, Joe Biden said he would veto Medicare for all*. Just this week , Hakeem Jeffries said he did not
78.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Your reading comprehension is way off. The article says "Each year in Australia, up to 420 people are diagnosed with acral or mucosal melanomas. They affect people of all ethnic backgrounds, and are the most common forms of melanoma
79.
by anonymars 2mo ago
If you think I'm merely "tone policing" then you still miss the point. I don't agree with your translation of "Washington didn't make it a voteable decision" to "both sides are the same" (with t
80.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Article: " two forms of rare melanoma are not caused by exposure to the sun.." > Most skin cancers are not a big deal, and even Melanomas can vanish on their own PSA: don't take medical advice from internet comments
81.
by anonymars 2mo ago
> You quite clearly came in to defend someone who did, though > "I already have universal healthcare here in Canada" I don't think I'm the one misreading the discussion as it is. If you take a deep breath and re-re
82.
by anonymars 2mo ago
> It 100% boggles my mind that you'd look at that once again incredibly partisan voting result and decide "Oh well, I might as well vote republican" Who said any of this? "I" said nothing of the sort I don'
83.
by anonymars 2mo ago
> I don’t see how this isn’t obvious What contribution does this add to your point? It comes off as a put-down
84.
by anonymars 2mo ago
> The real problem is people like you refusing to vote for the people with the policy you want, as often as not as part of a bothsidesist stance designed to get more upvote in peer forums like HN That's a lot of words they didn&#x
85.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Long video but informative: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJcbevbBzsc (~26 min)
86.
by anonymars 2mo ago
I mixed it up and GP is right. But you are also right (which illustrates the point GGP was making) If you and I are in a phone call (the target of the phone call located in a one-party consent jurisdiction), I can record it or you can recor
87.
by anonymars 2mo ago
Exactly, that's only one-party consent
88.
by anonymars 2mo ago
The days when updates used to add things instead of taking them away!
89.
by anonymars 2mo ago
It happens sometimes, even in the present day: almost certainly it means something leaked and hit 9999 GDI objects (or user objects?) -- you can add those columns in task manager. Killing the offending process should fix it
90.
by anonymars 2mo ago
> SVB collapse has shown that the 250k limit is basically not relevant Only as long as you're too big to fail...

More ›