Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
anonym29
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
91.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
>Warrantless telephone surveillance by law enforcement Not a part of PRISM. Microsoft was the very first PRISM partner, as I said.
92.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
>(especially Microsoft) Are you joking? When was this? Remember, Microsoft was the very first partner to deliver working warrantless surveillance capabilities (against their customers) to the NSA as part of the unconstitutional PRISM p
93.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
If one supports both reduction in global growth and a simultaneous increase in local growth in wealthy, western countries, where is the reduction supposed to come from? Isn't this essentially indirect advocacy for massive, rapid decrea
94.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
This is a strawman. The natural change happens orders of magnitude faster than 300 million years. Also, is there a way to move heat into space that doesn't require adding more heat into the atmosphere than is removed from the expulsion
95.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
Poor analogy. 23° C global average temperature increase, even slowly, will end a lot of life if nothing is done to address impacts. The rate of change isn't what causes those deaths; for 23° C warming, the terminal metric is indeed its
96.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
I am saying that earth's average temperature has raised by 23° C before with zero human impact, and it will raise by as much as 23° C again, even if you cut all human carbon emissions to zero overnight (itself an effective impossibilit
97.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
>So, exactly what is the source of skepticism? We should define climate skepticism, to avoid indicting a strawman. I'd start with my definition, as someone with unorthodox views on climate that often place me at odds with progressiv
98.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
My first choice would be non-SSO. Let me pick a username (or email address) and a password. Btw, thanks for the response. Not sure why you got downvoted for it, but you have my gratitude for being one of few devs who are sincerely responsiv
99.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
Neat project idea, but truly ruined by requiring a google sign-in both to submit new projects and to donate to projects. Dead service to me until that's gone. Remember, Google aids and abets militaries of governments that the UN has fo
100.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
I have applied twice with half a dozen public CVEs and have been denied both times.
101.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
Are you kidding? Sexless long-term partnerships are nothing new; they've been around for ages - that's just called marriage!
102.
▲
by
anonym29
4mo ago
Say no to malware - say no to Cloudflare
103.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
What about for people who do want follow the K-1 process "by the book"? It sounds like they would they now need to come over, get married, go back to their origin country to apply for status adjustment, and then come back over a
104.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
A highly agreeable housing inspector isn't going to be better at their job than a disagreeable housing inspector. I want my housing inspector to be harsh, unforgiving, and not grant the benefit of the doubt. A highly extroverted person
105.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
A lot of pop-psychology doesn't hold up when subject to empirical review, but OCEAN / "Big 5" does, and it's probably a decent starting point. E.g. if you are low in extraversion and agreeableness, you probably woul
106.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
So what does this do to the K-1 fiancée visa? Your partner gets the visa, they come over, you get married, and then they have to leave and submit an application to get status changed from their origin country? Seriously? WTF is this crap?
107.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
More keystrokes.
108.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
1. Often disregards the question's recipient. Particularly for questions that could be easily answered by AI.
109.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
>you just proved that there's no difference between asking you or asking the AI. Ding ding ding, we have a winner! Please do not ask me questions that I know nothing more about than AI. Wish there was something like LMGTFY but for A
110.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
"Won't someone please think of the poor billion dollar corporations?! Those executives won't survive without a fifth vacation home!"
111.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
I look forward to the day that society finally decides to hold Meta (Facebook), Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, Apple etc accountable for their transgressions against humanity. Some say it will never happen, but they said that about the now-d
112.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
Bosgame M5 (Strix Halo) w/ 128 GB still goes for $2800 right now. SH systems have surged in price dramatically but quite unevenly. >The best option is likely to rent hardware on Runpod. Vast.ai is much cheaper, but the broader point
113.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
Strix Halo at $2k with similar TG and about half the PP of DGX Spark was a pretty good deal IMO, especially considering it's also a full x86 system... 16c/32t Zen 5, 40 CU RDNA 3.5, 128 GB unified memory at ~220 GB/s real-wor
114.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
"A well administered supply chain, being necessary to the freedom of an open internet, the right of the developers to keep and bear hundreds of uninspected transitive dependencies, shall not be infringed."
115.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
The true advantage of locally self-hostable, open weight models isn't about monetary cost at all, it's about the CIA triad. Running locally, you get confidentiality of knowing your tokens are only ever being processed by your own
116.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
>1. DS4F can run on a 128GB MacBook. M2.7 is larger (8 bit weights of routed experts). There is to see how it holds at 4 bits. At 2 bits it may not work well at all. M2.7 is smaller than DS4, 230B total params vs 284B total params. At an
117.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
Third party inference costs are a moot point for people running these models locally. I am currently serving Minimax M2.7 to myself at ~$0.015/1M blended tokens worth of electricity on my own local hardware, where I get all of the conf
118.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
This may be relevant for parallelizable workloads. For reference on my perspective: I come at this as someone who is exclusively concerned with sequential, non-parallelizable, single-user, single-system workloads.
119.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
Per AA's Omniscience Index benchmark, the "non-hallucination rate" subcomponent (1 - hallucination rate) of 4% for DS4F vs 66% for M2.7. https://artificialanalysis.ai/leaderboards/models?weights=op...
120.
▲
by
anonym29
5mo ago
M2.7 was never open source, only open weight, which fulfills a lot of the spirit of open source, but isn't really the same thing as a whole. The noncommercial license is basically impossible to enforce if you're self-hosting anywa
More ›