anonym29

42 ms·

781.
by anonym29 2y ago
Criminal apologia? What criminals am I defending? No victim = no crime. An individual choosing to ingest questionable substances of questionable origin, by their own free choice, only has consequences, not victims.
782.
by anonym29 2y ago
CEXs aren't a factor unless you wish to trade your valuable, scarce Bitcoin for worthless pieces of paper and linen, backed by nothing for the last 50+ years, that have had a 40% expansion in supply in the last 5 years (AKA counterfeit
783.
by anonym29 2y ago
Your assertion is factually untrue, unless you include deaths from comorbidities arising from the use of government-approved carcinogens like alcohol and tobacco. Remember, the war on drugs isn't about protecting you from harmful subst
784.
by anonym29 2y ago
And yet, conceptually, there's still no capacity humans have that camera-only autonomous vehicles can't be given, even if they don't have it right now, right?
785.
by anonym29 2y ago
You think the death toll of the US government is below 500,000? I have some most unfortunate news for you... The US government killed over 250,000 civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and remains the only government to ever deploy atomic we
786.
by anonym29 2y ago
You seem to be misunderstanding censorship resistance. It means that no government can block or stop a crypto transaction the way they can credit card and bank transactions, and has nothing to do with FIAT on/offramps at CEXs, nor with
787.
by anonym29 2y ago
Your government has murdered uncountably more innocent people than those who've died from voluntarily choosing to ingest drugs.
788.
by anonym29 2y ago
How are humans able to drive safely in the fog without redundant sensors?
789.
by anonym29 2y ago
Bitcoin has never been hacked. The victims did not practice proper key management. The victims got hacked because of their own insecure key management, not because of any vulnerability in Bitcoin. To claim otherwise is like claiming that be
790.
by anonym29 2y ago
How do you figure this was generated by an LLM rather than typed by a person who just cares about treating everyone with compassion, acceptance, and empathy? Also, that sentence is grammatically valid. What's your gripe with it? Would
791.
by anonym29 2y ago
LIDAR is more complicated than camera-only approaches. Human drivers have just two eyes, surely software can do better than humans with more eyes that have better resolution than our own. Simple.
792.
by anonym29 2y ago
Protip: you might want to spell 'divisive' correctly if you're going to hurl that insult at the same person you're calling a moron.
793.
by anonym29 2y ago
The R35 really was a bit of a pioneer in redefining "performance car" from some ultra-light RWD pocket rocket with white-knuckle, ****-puckering, hair-trigger inputs into some big heavy cruiser that your grandmother could comforta
794.
by anonym29 2y ago
As long as you're stock or just doing some bolt ons and an E85/FF tune, the DCT is fine. If you're doing big power upgades, you will need to throw in a shep trans kit or something else, but you're gonna need forged con r
795.
by anonym29 2y ago
Not if you're using Molly-FOSS, which strips all Google integrations down to a shared library level. UnifiedPush instead of Firebase. OSM for location sharing instead of GMaps. There are de-googled AOSP-based mobile OS's such as G
796.
by anonym29 2y ago
I was sitting here thinking everyone else was wrong under the assunption that almost nobody here actually tried to read and interpret that wording in the least generous way possible (i.e. how lawyers intetpret everything), but I guess the j
797.
by anonym29 2y ago
I'm not making the claim that users don't understand what "selling their data" means, I'm making the claim that Mozilla is not doing anything that any reasonable person other than a lawyer interpreting the CCPA in t
798.
by anonym29 2y ago
If you're installing untrustworthy, closed source, proprietary third party kernel modules into your untrutworthy, closed source, proprietary operating system, why even bother with LibreWolf? You have a unambiguous revealed preference o
799.
by anonym29 2y ago
Sorry for the delay, got rate limited. The Mozilla Corporation sharing user metadata with the Mozilla Foundation to assist with internal decision making may technically meet California's definition of "sale of data" despite c
800.
by anonym29 2y ago
Sorry for the delay, got rate limited. The Mozilla Corporation sharing user metadata with the Mozilla Foundation to assist with internal decision making may technically meet California's definition of "sale of data" despite c
801.
by anonym29 2y ago
They're not selling user data in any sense that any ordinary, reasonable person would understand, only in California's excessively broad definition that may technically cover a litany of entirely noncommercial uses, like using o
802.
by anonym29 2y ago
Firefox didn't make stupid policy changes. Firefox made policy changes they were legally required to in order to comply with a stupidly-worded California law. And thank WHATWG for making it impossible for indie players to remain compli
803.
by anonym29 2y ago
What remains unclear is why anyone who cares enough about their privacy to use LibreWolf would still be on Windows in the first place. Microsoft is easily ten thousand times worse than Mozilla.
804.
by anonym29 2y ago
For what it's worth, the included uBO extension's blocklists do get updated automatically, even though LibreWolf doesn't. What LibreWolf does offer is a slick Docker-based build tool/suite that's nearly easy enough
805.
by anonym29 2y ago
Perhaps the world's most digital-native democracy isn't the fairest comparison to us ye olden paper pushers, lol.
806.
by anonym29 2y ago
If I had a nickel for every time I repeated this exact line, verbatim in casual conversation...
807.
by anonym29 2y ago
Even if I don't necessarily agree with it, I can understand an argument for not allowing credit cards to suffice for this (not everyone has good enough credit to get a credit card - we shouldn't discriminate against the poor and a
808.
by anonym29 2y ago
Oooh, just tried upvoting this one and it looks like your karma stayed constant at 8301. Strange. I wonder if there's a limit to how much karma one account can give another through upvotes within a certain time period.
809.
by anonym29 2y ago
I think an equal number of upvotes and a downvotes/flags does this, too.
810.
by anonym29 2y ago
Upvoted from my PinePhone Pro :)

More ›