Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
anonyfox
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
34 ms
·
361.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
I can assure you that the minimal requirement to be in the in-group is being born there, but even that might not be enough if your parents aren't already well-integrated. A bit like trying to blend into japan - you will ALWAYS be the g
362.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
well at least climate disaster is actually happening and when in doubt could need _more_ attention. the depressing/frustrating part is people acting like "won't happen to me so why bother". I don't know many peopl
363.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
(please ignore the german texts, I only googled some accurate images for illustration) - nature looks like: https://www.alltrails.com/de/route/germany/wander-tour-harbu... - "rural" village https:&
364.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
germany, or I think many central/western europe areas have that
365.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
i think currently those 6-figure salaries are looking great for like most of humanity - I don't expect seismic shifts here. but there is a funny mechanic at play certainly: once some dev work gets cheap as a commodity, demand surges su
366.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
bonus points for good public transport, so you can live rural but still are ~30mins of a train or similar away from lots of workplaces.
367.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
I switched from a "big city" (300k citizens) into a village (1800 citizens) right at the beach with my garden bein between some farms, a lovely forest and some sand beach on the baltic sea. Went from enterprise job in the city to
368.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
actually bing is growing massively while google is shifting into irrelevance everywhere (except android) - even laypeople now prefer to NOT use google left and right
369.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
don't fall into this mental trap. you can get into recursion quite easily here, and figuring out what to prompt can start from simple general questions - and there is no need for a developer at all, aside from the current limitations
370.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
I‘d like to use midjourney via an API from my scripts, but the only way of using it right now seems to be via discord, or did I miss something? Seems like Dall-E is what I have to use for now :/
371.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
I‘d love to have a simple way of calling ReactDOM.renderToString() on my express server that does block to actually wait for API calls so that SSR‘ed HTML is populated. I am very willing to trade performance against simplicity here. Besides
372.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
I think this is purely a statistics problem. Like all breakthroughs are actually _discoveries_ of things that already do exist or mechanisms that can be exploited somehow. There is a huge amount of information flowing around us in realtime,
373.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
I assume that I am already exposed to months of prompting training now, and probably frame things differently than others on their first try? I understood that a huge success% depends on the input prompt as the context. In my case, just to
374.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
tbh you are correct right now, ... but: we came from not being able to make a sensible output to these riddles at all, now discussing partial logical failures while it "got" the overall puzzle. Vast simplification and slightly inc
375.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
GPT-4 meanwhile: To solve this puzzle, the man must follow these steps to transport his belongings across the river without any of them being harmed or eaten: The man takes the meat-eating goat across the river first, leaving the vegan wolf
376.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
I just asked ChatGPT (v4!) and it’s a bit sensitive but otherwise correct: "Surfacing" is a song by Slipknot from their self-titled debut album, released in 1999. Please note that the lyrics contain explicit language. Here is a po
377.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
I do and used it
378.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
There several reasons for that, but one key thing is that people do not, in general, desperatly dream of the „get rich quick“ to escape their life situation. A big share is simply well off, taken care of if there are problems, and live thei
379.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
Just for demonstration purposes: imagine we get rid of voting alltogether. Instead, a random representative sample of 1000 people is chosen from the population, for some congress, for a year. They rule during that time. Some rules cannot be
380.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
Neither. More like: if you are sick, you can go to a doc for free, he is paid for by the public. Want to become a doc? Get that education for free, including some monthly money to live during studying. Those teachers? Same thing, paid for b
381.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
My point is that people should not have to serve or suffer for the system, but the system has to work for them. There is more than enough wealth for everyone, it’s only a distribution problem. For that, modern tech surely can help
382.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
Then finally the 99% screwed people realize that this is where (crony) capitalism is supposed to end up in the long run. Time for a forceful redistribution and system change. Can’t happen soon enough.
383.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
I think you will be surprised here. Its a huge value for many average people, highly accessible and basically free. This is not an adoption wave, but an unprecedent tsunami!
384.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
it actually was a great idea and had a good implementation. but google seems not capable to promote/market/maintain/grow a product, especially not something targeting the younger side of the B2C market like a social network.
385.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
most nonfiction books are either: - padded blogposts/tweets to appear thicker/more valuable - rampantly wrong pseudoscience and opinion pieces that trigger emotions instead of brains - once useful advice that is now horribly outda
386.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
No, this is solely because a) chatbot responses are much more expensive than traditional search as well as b) monetizing them is also an unsolved problem, and together both reasons have to potential to eliminate googles profits in deadly am
387.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
No, this is strictly a regression. A perversion even. Infrastructure is what you ultimately pay for. making that more complicated (contextual, my ass) so that people might give up faster and "just use vercel" is very clearly the d
388.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
The issue is simple: we need to stop emissions from individual mobility, no matter what. soon. it probably needs the ban first to build up enough political/economical motivation to solve subsequent problems. "affordable cars"
389.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
thats fine for me, because it literally replaces a liter of coffee per day or even more, and keeps the headache from caffeine withdrawal at bay
390.
▲
by
anonyfox
4y ago
Me too, https://spacegoods.com/ and I can confirm it eliminates the need for coffee during the day as well as it helps for staying in the zone a bit
More ›