anoncake

64 ms·

631.
by anoncake 6y ago
Judges rarely die in office. What's your point?
632.
by anoncake 6y ago
It is not just a crappy "generalized client application".
633.
by anoncake 6y ago
The eternity clause implicitly protects itself because anything else would be absurd and judges aren't computers.
634.
by anoncake 6y ago
Source, please.
635.
by anoncake 6y ago
No. The browser is a document viewer, and that's what it's actually good at.
636.
by anoncake 6y ago
So is every computer. 2^(RAM size in bits + Caches size in bits + Registers size in bits + stuff I forgot) is a finite number of states.
637.
by anoncake 6y ago
Sure. But others are entirely useless or even harmful. If you want people to implement dark patterns, tracking, advertising, or walled gardens, you have to pay them.
638.
by anoncake 6y ago
Violet Gibson tried to kill Mussolini because she, a fanatic fascist, considered him a traitor to his race?
639.
by anoncake 6y ago
That is literally the opposite of what I wrote.
640.
by anoncake 6y ago
Financial incentives redirect labour from useful to profitable activities.
641.
by anoncake 6y ago
Then why did Violet Gibson try to kill Mussolini, not someone less well protected? If you want to cause as much murder as possible, shouldn't you kill a policeperson or a pacifist activist rather than a fascist dictator?
642.
by anoncake 6y ago
Very unlikely. Germany had no chance of invading Britain as its navy was a joke. Without invading the Soviet Union, it would have run out of oil even faster than it historically did, crippling its ability to defend against bombing attacks.
643.
by anoncake 6y ago
Different politics = different agenda.
644.
by anoncake 6y ago
To kill the leaders of democracies would be genocide.
645.
by anoncake 6y ago
So they succeeded at attempting?
646.
by anoncake 6y ago
Working without (socializing all day) is doing your job. (Working without socializing) all day is being a drone. And likely not even doing your job any more effectively.
647.
by anoncake 6y ago
No it is not, because what you describe isn't open source.
648.
by anoncake 6y ago
I agree, it isn't. But since real social interaction is currently not available in too many cases, limiting children's access to the closest substitute is not a good idea.
649.
by anoncake 6y ago
Because working for hours without stopping for even a second is the most effective way of working?
650.
by anoncake 6y ago
Your own time, like lunch break?
651.
by anoncake 6y ago
You must not know these WFH advocates on HN.
652.
by anoncake 6y ago
Are we? I must be doing cycling wrong.
653.
by anoncake 6y ago
I wish it was.
654.
by anoncake 6y ago
And therefore, all social interaction that's left.
655.
by anoncake 6y ago
And do what instead, meet in person?
656.
by anoncake 6y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change
657.
by anoncake 6y ago
Even those. Disturbing pedestrians is not okay, of course. But why do people ride on the pavement in the first place? Because car drivers are making the road too dangerous.
658.
by anoncake 6y ago
The trolley problem also used to be controversial. Now it's: A trolley is running towards a single 80-year old. If you do pull a trigger, it will instead kill an unknown number of people, including children. If you don't, you&#x27
659.
by anoncake 6y ago
Don't expect me to use your euphemisms. Even if you, personally, don't need real human contact. Mass deaths aren't particularly more traumatizing than individual ones. You don't know these people anyway.
660.
by anoncake 6y ago
Your quote doesn't say anything about probabilities, so it does not support your argument.

More ›