anon_tor_12345

11 ms·

61.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
I wish people would stop being so entitled. This isn't the nytimes or something. It's somebody's research blog. Your comment is analogous to demanding that Japanese speakers write in English so that you may be able to read th
62.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>Ibm is a competitor in this space I'm well aware - doesn't mean they're not right. >You make a hello world program before making actual useful programs. how hilarious would it be if some chip manufacturer bragged about
63.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
i got curious (since you said you'd seen this years ago) and found my way to your cppcon 2016 talk. good talk but in particular i want to congratulate you on the weaving pun (first multithreaded tech).
64.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
that's what everyone says but imagine 10 years from now someone proves BQP < P. since that proof will entail a ptime reduction you'll immediately have a ptime shor's and etc.
65.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>"Already we run quantum computers that can perform calculations beyond the reach of classical computers" Yea this isn't true. Their 54 qubit machine can simulate random circuits pretty fast but 1) that's not at all u
66.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
I don't understand this question? Grover's algorithm is itself faster than classical search algos. It is as of yet unknown whether quantum computers are more powerful than classical computers; there is no proof that BQP is strictl
67.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
Anyone that wants actually wysiwyg* editing for latex should use lyx which is absolutely fantastic. I've been writing latex for >10 years and I wish someone told me about it on day 1. It even integrates with a CAS if you're so
68.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
yea bytedance has seen slowdown in user growth so they're growth hacking by targeting potential users on... hn. how about it's a fun app and there are so many shitty apps that that makes it remarkable (worthy of remark)? i know th
69.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
i was in the first cohort of FB users in 2004. i remember myspace, friendster, digg, etc. i still use reddit and have fb and ig accounts but i haven't posted on either in over a decade. TikTok is the first truly enjoyable social media
70.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
STEM people love to bring up the sokal affair. the same STEM people also don't realize that many journals and conferences in STEM have been tricked by things like this (more specifically precursors using HMMs and etc). https:/&#x
71.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>run an AI model what exactly would this AI model be trained on?
72.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>There was a time for proprietary systems like this but I think it has passed. spoken, truly, like someone that has never worked in a [^software] engineering firm. civil/electrical/chemical engineering firms all uniformly rely
73.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
you can get pretty close with mathematica using the notation package e.g. these three defines compute euler-lagrange equations given a lagrangian. https://imgur.com/aMfdYQy
74.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>and we ban that sort of account ... >anon_tor_12345 lol
75.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
https://utulsa.edu/sexual-violence-prevention-education/alco...
76.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>I felt being taken advantage of that he had unprotected sex with me when I was intoxicated. At least read the article before being dismissive. Imagine being 20, getting raped, and having randoms on the internet completely invalidate how
77.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
the subtitle of the article is >The accelerated commitment will fund a new North Carolina campus and *job-creating investments* in innovative fields like silicon engineering and 5G technology other pull quotes from the article >Apple
78.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>Why do you think domestic investment is so economically useless that it must be a charitable act? that's not what op (the person you're responding to) is saying at all. they're simply saying that apple disguises its infra
79.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
But we're not talking about hypothetical pedagogy here. Exams cover usub and trig sub and methods of partial fractions. In fact we're not even talking about calc at all but software interviews, which, like or it not, examine trick
80.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
fwiw I don't ask dp questions on interviews and most of FB doesn't either (I didn't know that before I got hired)
81.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>Anyways, did you get the FB job? Yup
82.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
You dread the thought of coming across someone who mastered a challenging technique? Ok
83.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
you're wrong on all counts but i'm going to be the one to correct you.
84.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>modern lens the drawing displayed in the article is from 1975. i'm sure there are plenty of people on this very forum born well before 1975. we're not talking about judging someone from ancient mesopotamia here... i think the
85.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
>DP is basically brute-force but you can reuse some of the subproblems. this is like saying "integration is basically weighing a bunch of buckets but the buckets are really small" cool but that won't help you find the corr
86.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
everyone always says this as if it's some kind of galaxy brain epiphany. it's not because 1) on interviews they want you to explicitly construct the array very often i.e. it's the different between hire and a strong hire exac
87.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
i'm late to the comments but hopefully this helps someone: i struggled with DP as much as anyone. i read all of the standard resources (CLRS, vazirani, kleinberg, etc), watch all the youtube videos, did all of the practice problems in
88.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
not sure what publications you've been reading but every one i've written and every one anyone in my lab has written includes the research engineers (ie devs) in the author list
89.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
building abstractions is a way to diffuse responsibility. attributing it to fate or some vague natural law is a way to absolve of personal responsibility. no one that isn't turning q blind eye to the problem would claim anything of the
90.
by anon_tor_12345 5y ago
i recently read the the firesim from the berkeley arch group and that was interesting and impressive so I'll eventually read this too. but can talk about the fact that there are 51 authors on this paper? i was annoyed when i had to inc

More ›