anon4

61 ms·

541.
by anon4 11y ago
I'm expecting Disney to change the law to allow for authorship reassignment, so the "until death of author+70 years" effectively becomes "until dissolution of The Disney Corporation+70 years", after which we can dro
542.
by anon4 11y ago
Much less art being produced is preferable to having a fucked up legal system.
543.
by anon4 11y ago
That's more of a remix of the idea, than a blatant rip-off.
544.
by anon4 11y ago
For those confused: JSX is a statically-typed, object-oriented programming language designed to run on modern web browsers. Being developed at DeNA as a research project, … https://jsx.github.io/
545.
by anon4 11y ago
Compare with this other recent article about one of the only societies on Earth that have abolished play: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201207/al...
546.
by anon4 11y ago
Sounds in some ways quite a lot like Discordianism or motivated by Discordianist principles.
547.
by anon4 11y ago
Can't you script it in visual basic and pin a button to one of the ribbons?
548.
by anon4 11y ago
The only digital life I'm worried about in the event of my untimely death is the few IRC channels I frequent. Just let those guys know I'm gone, put up a "He's dead, Jim, take what you want." on my GitHub and leave
549.
by anon4 11y ago
"Oh, you have to do a full reset. Shut down the computer, wait ten seconds, start it again, hold ctrl+alt+F4, wait for the double-beep, then let go of the keys. Yes, do this every time it locks up."
550.
by anon4 11y ago
If everyone is equally worse off, won't it lead to lower prices?
551.
by anon4 11y ago
dont worry i upvoted u. i couldn't understand what u sayd, but it seemsed bad to just get so very downvoted fer what u believe in.
552.
by anon4 11y ago
Counted 6 downvotes so far. At least explain yourself. I want to hear the reason. Because the press on cycling is mostly negative and as a responsible cyclist myself, who has never ran a red light, wears all mandated safety gear and knows
553.
by anon4 11y ago
This should be an error and you should be required to write int i = 0; // or some other default value
554.
by anon4 11y ago
I love Java's behaviour. It gives a few false positives as you've noticed, but you can fix that just by doing Object a = null; and go on your way. You do run the risk of a null pointer exception if you don't assign i
555.
by anon4 11y ago
As if we needed more proof that GCC is a fucking joke...
556.
by anon4 11y ago
You can already break a lot of programs with -Wall -Werror (I generally compile my code with both, but turn them off for libraries). Just hide the amazing optimisation behind an -foptimise-undefined-behaviour which you can only turn on if y
557.
by anon4 11y ago
The Java compiler WILL reject this program, because x is not initialised on all code-paths. This is not a valid program.
558.
by anon4 11y ago
If we miscompile (or outright delete) something which is marked "undefined behaviour" by the C standard, then lots of old libraries will build without errors, but fail in various fun ways during use, including having severe secu
559.
by anon4 11y ago
You mean volatile memory?
560.
by anon4 11y ago
You mean something like a Court Martial? I agree.
561.
by anon4 11y ago
Sure, because that schoolboy flipping off the officer was obviously a punk gangster Al-Qaeda sleeper agent suicide bomber.
562.
by anon4 11y ago
Android does it by giving each application a different user and then granting that user certain privileges.
563.
by anon4 11y ago
Burn it and decrease inflation.
564.
by anon4 11y ago
I believe the time-scale is such, that the Sun will swallow the Earth long before it stops spinning.
565.
by anon4 11y ago
You could say they wouldn't have been born in the first place if not for this amount of research needing to be done.
566.
by anon4 11y ago
I still don't understand why so many are jumping on the Linux gaming bandwagon. I mean, it's nice for me and all, I just don't really see the business gains for them.
567.
by anon4 11y ago
Huh. Does that mean I can write class A { public: virtual void foo() = 0; }; void A::foo() {} class B: public class A {}; B b; b.foo(); and that will work?
568.
by anon4 11y ago
Now that same-sex marriage is legal, would that work if two heterosexual people technically marry each other? At least then you don't run the risk of the other party deciding they like this marriage thing and having a very complicated
569.
by anon4 11y ago
Microsoft really picked the wrong abstraction here. They wanted it so that each device can be separately configured and known, implementing a system that can support if you plug ten devices that are exactly the same, but want them configure
570.
by anon4 11y ago
It's not that much. That lawyer then would spend those money staying at one of your hotels or such. What goes around comes around.

More ›