anm89

12 ms·

61.
by anm89 4y ago
Another good home lab chemistry youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq7a5_tvBPM
62.
by anm89 4y ago
Reposted because they are recruiting on the front page
63.
Replit used legal threats to kill my open-source project(intuitiveexplanations.com)
112 points by anm89 4y ago|8 comments
64.
by anm89 4y ago
The winners will turn into microsofts and IBMs, the majority will die or get acquired at much lower valuations. The question is, does that happen in the next year or two or is this can somehow magically kicked another 5-7 years. I vote that
65.
by anm89 4y ago
If they are only doing this size I think the question would be, how many rounds passed 2 will they have to go.
66.
by anm89 4y ago
https://archive.is/mlXhj
67.
Tell HN: Jan 2023 has already had 1/3 of the total yearly tech layoffs for 2022
17 points by anm89 4y ago|5 comments
68.
by anm89 4y ago
I feel like the bigger story here is that someone was delusional enough to buy one of these things for 52k in the first place.
69.
by anm89 4y ago
You should tell that to the hundreds of thousands of people in places like Argentina, Turkey, Venezuela, and Iran who rely on it This is a never endingly week argument.
70.
by anm89 4y ago
Basically the number you are looking for is global real GDP growth. This also misses the mark in many ways but it's the closest easy proxy for what you want. So just take global real gdp growth and figure out the ratio that went to th
71.
by anm89 4y ago
200B is a drop in the bucket at these levels of figures. We are talking about total wealth amassed in a year. The number they cite is 42 trillion
72.
by anm89 4y ago
I'm happy it isn't up to you
73.
by anm89 4y ago
This doesn't even make sense. This comment is clearly a response to your parent comment. How could my response to your comment have been in another thread if your parent comment wasn't in the other thread? I'm honestly curiou
74.
by anm89 4y ago
What a terrible person, selfishly trying to spend their own money to address problems important to them. Again, real piece of shit.
75.
by anm89 4y ago
This is funny because it's one of these things that is : - empirically incorrect (the idea that very few people beat the index) - but repeatedly constantly with unbelievable confidence by people who don't know the subject well - w
76.
by anm89 4y ago
Yeah, the private fiefdom of funding Parkinson's research. Just like the dark ages. Clearly a real piece of shit.
77.
by anm89 4y ago
My take on "smart". There is no one thing called "smart" so all of the people debating whether this guy is smart are missing the point. People like this are "smart" in the sense that they have a beyond average
78.
by anm89 4y ago
Funny how 99% of message board participants are sure they would never do layoffs but 99% of CEOs actually do them
79.
by anm89 4y ago
People in this thread seem to be expressing confusion as to why they would be doing this "when the economy is still so strong" The economy is not "still strong" by most measures. Employment is still strong although there
80.
by anm89 4y ago
The market right now is FAR from overheated. In fact maritime shipping is collapsing right now. https://www.drewry.co.uk/supply-chain-advisors/supply-chain-... Both volume and rates are down roughly 80% YOY.
81.
by anm89 4y ago
The workflow is a function. You put in an input and get a consistent output within certain parameters The plan is a procedural instruction list. It lacks consistency. It is whatever procedural set of things happened to have been written dow
82.
by anm89 4y ago
> If you have a stable system, then there is no use to specify a goal. You will get whatever the system will deliver. A goal beyond the capability of the system will not be reached. If you have not a stable system, then there is
83.
by anm89 4y ago
As other people have said, the red flag is this post. Your son is fine. He's not who I'd be worried about.
84.
by anm89 4y ago
Fair
85.
by anm89 4y ago
I would talk to an attorney. I have a hard time believing no law was violated here. I bet there is class action potential here given the number of people just in this thread who say it has happened to them.
86.
by anm89 4y ago
The Pinker playbook. Do a bunch of statistical handwaving to define a question in a way gets a cheery outcome but hides the real issues. Claim everything is getting better so there is no need to fix any of the actual problems by doing thing
87.
by anm89 4y ago
Agreed. I'm not interested in Poker at all so that's not where I got this from. This is taught in undergrad economics classes.
88.
by anm89 4y ago
roughly, imagine a decision tree where each end node has a set of probabilities and a utility points values per outcome probability. You multiply out the probability of each outcome with it's point value and pick the decision path whic
89.
by anm89 4y ago
This is the smart money take. They ran an EV calculation on the cost of half heartedly allowing self repair (but in a sneaky way in which surely favors them) with a reduced probability of legislation vs the probability of legislation being
90.
by anm89 4y ago
This is empirically not true when you look at the data on who owns financial assets in America. The "average person" owns essentially no financial assets. The median person especially owns approaching zero financial assets. The to

More ›