ankit219

8 ms·

31.
by ankit219 9mo ago
I do not understand the stubbornness with wanting to use the auth part. On local, just call the claude code from your harness, or better there is a claude agent sdk, both of which have clear auth and are permitted acc to anthropic. But to s
32.
by ankit219 9mo ago
The issue is that claude code is cheap because it uses API's unused capacity. These kind of circumventions hurt them both ways, one they dont know how to estimate api demand, and two, the nature of other harnesses is more bursty (eg: p
33.
by ankit219 9mo ago
Its a strange phenomenon. You want to call out the bs but then you are just giving them engagement and boost. You want to stay away but there is a sort of confluence where these guys tend to ride on each others' post and boosts those p
34.
by ankit219 9mo ago
https://ankitmaloo.com The most basic version, but helps me publish blog posts quickly.
35.
by ankit219 9mo ago
I was not aware of this. Thank you for sharing. This is not common phrasing in either India or US.
36.
by ankit219 9mo ago
They can, but then cost per subscription would not be that low.
37.
by ankit219 9mo ago
From what i have read on twitter. People were purchasing max subs and using it as a substitute for API keys for their startups. Typical scrappy startup story but this has the same bursty nature as API in temrs of concurrency and parallel re
38.
by ankit219 9mo ago
Because your subscription depends on the very API business. Anthropic's cogs is rent of buying x amount of h100s. cost of a marginal query for them is almost zero until the batch fills up and they need a new cluster. So, API clusters a
39.
by ankit219 9mo ago
Thats a doublespeak. You are talking about an act with a legal basis. You follow and comply with those regulations lest you break the law. If it was a voluntary standard or code, maybe you could conform. The thread talks about the ACT and C
40.
by ankit219 9mo ago
No its not. You follow the rules or you adhere to them. You change your behavior or belief system to match a group's standard/norm (conform). Conform and follow/adhere are quite different, and convey the thought process under
41.
by ankit219 9mo ago
It was a joke on the name. Nothing to do with the content. Conform to newspeak is what 1984 is famous for.
42.
by ankit219 9mo ago
TIL you cant take a joke on the name, and you have to invoke a stated premise to feel better. If you really thing that is the only thing the act is doing (without realizing the carve outs it has for facial recognition etc.) then i have a to
43.
by ankit219 9mo ago
This was always against the terms of service. Took too long to crack down on it. There seems to be a lot of FUD on how anthropic prices it. but i think many devs and harness builders are intentionally misrespresenting things to build pressu
44.
by ankit219 9mo ago
Calling it "Conform" is very 1984esque. There is also a 2025 book (a dystopian romance) called the same: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/223239535-conform
45.
by ankit219 10mo ago
I am saying that if you force Apple to move away from integrated devices to something which has to be generic (modular like Intel) which does not know which hardware it will pair up with and hence needs baseline performance, it turns into a
46.
by ankit219 10mo ago
Modular in the sense you have to support multiple hardwares (of different kinds) instead of just one. Eventually you arrive at a place where software is good enough, and hardware + kernels cannot do the exact heavy lifting that is happening
47.
by ankit219 10mo ago
modular does not mean in terms of how the library is architected, but in terms of how many vendors/customers it needs to support. Airpods' hardware is built and then kernels are written in a way to compliment each other and get th
48.
by ankit219 10mo ago
Its mostly true when the integrating company cares for the user experience. Which apple clearly does. The example you shared is the opposite. I am imagining a kernel today written in a manner that airpods would be able to use it to extract
49.
by ankit219 10mo ago
A company making an integrated experience would inevitably provide a better experience/performance than a company asked to build for 100s of devices with different spec. That Apple did not want to open it up is a separate discussion. M
50.
by ankit219 10mo ago
Are we learning the wrong lessons? Integrated always works better than modular components. Here, Apple is being asked to enable their versions of software for third party devices, which do not have the same hardware assumptions as Apple did
51.
by ankit219 10mo ago
Think its a combination of factors. - Google cloud is setup for big organizations. Not for individuals. All cloud providers are pretty much confusing in a similar way. - India has specific rules re cybersecurity and financial regulations th
52.
by ankit219 11mo ago
Maybe, not lie about what they are doing? That is not unreasonable as a base expectation.
53.
by ankit219 11mo ago
you already sent the prompt to gemini api - and they likely recorded it. So in a way they can access it anyway. Posting here or not would not matter in that aspect.
54.
by ankit219 11mo ago
Openai, deepmind, anthropic, xai. who is the fifth frontier lab?
55.
I asked LLM to reverse engineer a unity game. It became a conspiracy theorist(ankitmaloo.com)
1 points by ankit219 11mo ago|0 comments
56.
by ankit219 11mo ago
because they put restrictions. now they cannot. because all the restrictions meant saying no to some legit things as well - inevitably. but then they got sued, laws got passed, to not be monopolistic, and still secure the users. this is the
57.
by ankit219 11mo ago
Google is about to find out the next step of this chain - give access to everyone, don't gatekeep / do checks, and yet take responsibility for anything that goes wrong. "You should open up the tool, put no restrictions, and y
58.
by ankit219 11mo ago
The thing is that if you are giving professional advice in US - legal, financial, medical - the other party can sue you for wrong or misleading advice. In that scenario, this leaves Openai exposed to a lawsuit, and this change seemingly eli
59.
by ankit219 11mo ago
They can block the site on a mac if they dont want you to purchase via a mac. They can block any browser agent they want if they dont like the traffic. They can also close your account if they have some reasons. They dont need a reason eith
60.
by ankit219 11mo ago
I think its more to do with obfuscation than simple agent buying stuff. Perplexity disguises its agents as chrome browser, and that messes up things at Amazon's end. Not saying its good or bad, but think of ad relevance, then recommend

More ›